Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That has probably been explained to them over 100 times on this forum, but they don't seem to comprehend that. Give them one more investigation, then he will be confirmed next week. No problem.
That has probably been explained to them over 100 times on this forum, but they don't seem to comprehend that. Give them one more investigation, then he will be confirmed next week. No problem.
The FBI doesn't generally do background checks on a candidate's life before the age of 18.
Why wouldn't he be confirmed? The GOP already put a sexual predator in the White House; apparently, Republicans have no problem with sexual predators occupying the highest offices in the land, and therefore have zero interest in thorough vetting.
The drinking age is relevant because nobody asked Kavanaugh about it, He bought it up to defend his drinking in high school... that he was a senior and seniors were allowed to drink (they weren't) . Why did Kavanaugh bring up this non-relevant (to you) defense when nobody asked?
"Yes, there were parties. And the drinking age was 18. And yes, the seniors were legal.”
"Yes, we drank beer, my friends and I, boys and girls. Yes, we drank beer. I liked beer. I still like beer,” he said.
“The drinking age, as I noted, was 18, so the seniors were legal. Senior year in high school, people were legal to drink.”
Lol, so you went away, dug up the quotes and still cant comprehend it. This factual statement is him admitting he drank underage. You brought up legal drinking ages to prove he lied. Yet all you did is prove he didnt The gift that keeps on giving.....
Oh really??? Is that why people close to both the accusers and Kavanaugh are cooperating? You do realize alot of these accusations are recently revealed right? Lot's of new information to go through.
This whole "investigation" is a sham. No transparency, and the White House trying to control it rather than let the FBI do their job. If there was nothing to be found, then why the need to control the investigation? Stinks to high heaven. And I can guarantee that if it were a Democrat being investigated and a Democratic president tried to control the investigation, all the right-wingers on here excusing it would be screaming holy h*ll.
There it is folks. The far left already calling the investigation a sham, just one day after it was agreed to by both Reps and Dems.
We knew this was coming. When the FBI states they found no evidence to substantiate those sexual misconduct claims this is what to expect.
The FBI doesn't generally do background checks on a candidate's life before the age of 18.
Why wouldn't he be confirmed? The GOP already put a sexual predator in the White House; apparently, Republicans have no problem with sexual predators occupying the highest offices in the land, and therefore have zero interest in thorough vetting.
coming from the party of Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton and Anthony Wiener.
The GOP's hamstringing of this investigation will be their downfall in November. I mean, talk about a BLATANT attempt to obstruct justice. I cannot WAIT for Mueller's report, because that's the only way that the nation will be able to rid themselves of the GOP scourge, and all the woman-hating right-wing trolls can scurry back under the bridge where they belong.
There it is folks. The far left already calling the investigation a sham, just one day after it was agreed to by both Reps and Dems.
We knew this was coming. When the FBI states they found no evidence to substantiate those sexual misconduct claims this is what to expect.
OF COURSE it's a sham. Yes, an investigation was agreed upon yesterday. Everyone assuming, of course, that the FBI would be free to do their job. Today, the White House announces further limits, including who the FBI may or may not interview, which is unheard of, and a complete travesty of justice.
The Democrats didn't seem to be too worried about any of that during the Clinton era. Hypocrites of course, but then again, we all know that.
The Democrats had already created this narrative that would apply to any male nominee Trump put up: Trump hates women, therefore Kavanaugh must hate them too. Now, we find out he hates them so much, he attacks them.
Wonder what the Democrats will come up with when Amy Barrett is nominated to replace Ginsburg...
Oh yes we were. Many of us were appalled at Bill Clinton, really angry with H. Clinton for throwing Lewinsky under the bus, and deeply sympathetic to the horrific treatment of Lewinsky at the hands of the GOP.
This whole "investigation" is a sham. No transparency, and the White House trying to control it rather than let the FBI do their job. If there was nothing to be found, then why the need to control the investigation? Stinks to high heaven. And I can guarantee that if it were a Democrat being investigated and a Democratic president tried to control the investigation, all the right-wingers on here excusing it would be screaming holy h*ll.
Getting the next excuse lined up already. You guys are so transparent.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The gift that keeps on giving.....