Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think Feinstein (and maybe Ford, who knows) sat on this letter exactly as long as it took to clean up Ford's social media footprint.
Nobody has come out to suggest that it is different than what was portrayed have they?
Whereas Kavanaugh has had many people speak up and say -- oh yeah I remember him and those boys and...yup.....
Look -- reality The White House is putting on restrictions to the investigation that they won't be able to use what they find anyways.
Bow at the feet of Trump & cry the Democrats abused the system while Trump, Kavanaugh & the Republicans did everything they could to block any information they could..
Won't matter. Doctor/patient privilege unless the patient agrees to the release. Supposedly Dr. Ford gave The Washington Post a copy of a portion of the notes.
Actually, she testified she didn't know if she gave WaPo a copy.
I think it is funny that folks can't understand how this letter got leaked but meanwhile we live in a time where information is leaked from The White House and nobody seems to be able to identify where it is coming from.
So, Feinstein wasn’t going to do anything about this sexual assault allegation at all? The hearings are complete, the vote set, and, but for the mysterious “leak”, Feinstein was going to do nothing about it?
Feinstein, the alleged guardian of women rights, was going to let this go?
To add, why would ford lawyer up with attorney Katz at al in early August? No inveztigation was going to happen; Feinstein must have thought the allegations were baseless. Yet, Feinstein office, for some reason, referred ford to an attorney. Why?
Have you all read his yearbook stuff -- come on -- that is not normal teen male stuff . It isn't -- It just isn't -- no matter what those old guys in the Senate say.
So, Feinstein wasn’t going to do anything about this sexual assault allegation at all? The hearings are complete, the vote set, and, bit for the mysterious “leak”, Feinstein was going to do nothing about it?
Feinstein, the alleged guardian of women rights, was going to let this go?
Yes, which is it? Was she just going to sit on it and let Kavanaugh be confirmed? Or, did she leak it? Hmmm.
I think we all know the answer - it was contrived and colluded. A witch hunt!
Partisanship. That's hilarious. To which party do the Senators making these accusations belong? To which party does Sen. Schumer, who vowed to never approve his nomination belong? To which party does the Senator who sat on these accusations for two months belong?
Are you serious. We are not talking about the senate where we have democrats and republicans. We are talking about the highest court. The Supreme Court justices should be bipartisan and need to be. Kavanaugh clearly showed he wasn't and therefore should not be confirmed.
Are you serious. We are not talking about the senate where we have democrats and republicans. We are talking about the highest court. The Supreme Court justices should be bipartisan and need to be. Kavanaugh clearly showed he wasn't and therefore should not be confirmed.
Just like Ginsburg openly opposing Trump right? She has brought shame on the SCOTUS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
