LOL don't ever mutter the words "For the greater good" when you oppose businesses reinvesting money and manufacturing/production here.
I'm a small business owner. I don't answer to investors. Customers and employees only, in a way they are an "investor" I guess...
How is it I can take advantage of Trump's tax cuts and some roll backs that benefitted me and be able to pay employees a sustainable wage? Yet. Walmart. GM. Ford. Can't or won't.
If you're implying it will cost more due to building new facilities, initially. It's a 1 time up front cost for the facility.
If you're implying labor costs.
Perhaps we should roll back taxes or other cost burdens conditionally so long as the company is providing full time employment, 100% American work force, hire and educate/train, and provide a self sustaining wage.
I can do it. They can too. So why oppose it? You make excuses for them to conduct business as usual out of
complacency. Oh well. We have been doing it that way for years. We can't do it any other way...
rriiiggghhtttt..... okie dokie...
Yeah. If they said the same thing in the 80s about switching from carburetors to fuel injection, they wouldn't be selling cars now would they? Nope. Not at all.
Hypocrisy.
Concerned for the greater good.
Doesn't want domestic production to return.
Wants to outsource everything because it's "cheaper"
Wants cost burdens to be absorbed by the company thus driving costs higher when they can no longer retain profit margin.
It's okay to force a companies hand when it's involving the carbon emissions.
Not okay when it's forcing a company to return to their roots and reinvest.
Only conclusion I can come up with.
NIMBY
Socialists-welfare for all, free all the things.
A ton of college professors who would be out of a job because a college degree wouldn't be mandatory for employment when the employer is absorbing the cost and paying the employee to learn and be productive and proficient in the area they have an interest in.
Worshippers of daddy .gov- business bad .gov good.
So which is it?