Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The left is admitting it doesn't matter if he did it. Their new line is "he got mad when we accused him of it so he's unfit for office". They are conceding that the accusations themselves were just a means to end end when they say that.
Had he not gotten angry at the accusations they'd be saying "if I got falsely accused of something like this I'd be mad as hell. Why isn't he angry? Someone with no human emotion is not fit to be a judge" or "He's not getting angry because he knows he's guilty".
He does not have the judicial temperament or character to be a Supreme Court judge, a lifetime position.
He was crying, screaming, and disrespectful during hearings. We all saw it happen live. If that had been a woman, she'd have likely been called hysterical or even crazy.
Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, his should step aside because of his outrageous, unflattering judicial behavior and multiple accounts of untoward behaviors in his past. This to save his family humiliation and the rest of us...from the anger and partisan attitude he exhibited and might continue to exhibit on the Supreme Court.
The funny/sad thing is how many men here on C-D are questioning Dr. Lord's emotions while she testified. I'd actually rather have her on the Supreme Court than him.
Kavanaugh's emotions showed that he's 100% dedicated to his career, and his family.
Democrats are trying to ruin both.
He'll get the last laugh, and own Dem for the next 25+ years.
He was not "screaming". Why the dramatics about that? He was crying because he was very upset at the attacks on his family. His entire body of work, everything that he has done, was under attack by an allegation that has, to this day, ZERO proof whatsoever. So what. He's human.
The fact remains, the Dems acted in a very disgusting way, and now the left wants to pretend that the bad actor here is Kavanaugh. No, he's not.
And by having him "step aside" it is absolutely not "for the good of the country" because it tells the scheming, lying Dems that they can continue these stupid games forever. It is absolutely the opposite of "good for the country".
LOL. IF ANY woman had behaved in that manner - she'd have been escorted out by the capitol police.
He was flat out YELLING at the American People and alternatively maudlin crying. I wonder how many beers he had before he came out on the floor.
Good LORD. Hillary testified for 11 hours after Republicans basically accused her of murdering, on purpose, 4 men and she held up a damn sight better than that.
Ok, see, here's the POINT YOU ARE MISSING. It doesn't matter, at this point if he did it. SHE DIDN'T PROVE IT AND THIS COUNTRY IS BASED ON THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE. Do you seriously want to live in a country where just an accusation can bring a persons whole life down? That's Gestapo stuff. It's scares the bejeejuz out of me. Are you like, really young by any chance?
What's the all the Dr Ford is slutty and Dr Ford is nutty and all the victim bashing then? No one has been convicted of anything. I don't know what you are so worried about false allegations for anyway. I don't know one man who has been accused of that let alone falsely. I don't know any woman that has falsely accused a man.
Si, let's say evidence does come up that she is telling the truth. Are you going to have any remorse for running her down?
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 28 days ago)
27,647 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron
...for the good of the country.
He does not have the judicial temperament or character to be a Supreme Court judge, a lifetime position.
He was crying, screaming, and disrespectful during hearings. We all saw it happen live. If that had been a woman, she'd have likely been called hysterical or even crazy.
Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, his should step aside because of his outrageous, unflattering judicial behavior and multiple accounts of untoward behaviors in his past. This to save his family humiliation and the rest of us...from the anger and partisan attitude he exhibited and might continue to exhibit on the Supreme Court.
Just like clockwork. Do they pay you to share the new memo?
An ex-boyfriend of Julie Swetnick's says that the Brett Kavanaugh accuser never talked about being gang-raped but she did tell him about how she liked to have sex with multiple men at a time.
Dennis Ketterer, a former Democratic candidate for Congress, said in a statement that the Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican chairman shared with reporters, that a conversation with Swetnick 'derailed' when she revealed that she 'liked to have sex with more than one guy at a time.'
'In fact sometimes with several at one time. She wanted to know if that would be OK in our relationship,' he said. 'I asked her if this was just a fantasy of hers. She responded that she first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time.'
'[b]ased on my direct experience with Julie, I do not believe her allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh,' he asserted.
Ketterer said that he is sensitive to the issue of sexual assault because he is himself a victim of of child molestation.
'I know what it’s like to be sexually assaulted and not be believed. I was 9 years old when it happened at the hands of my grandfather’s best friend,' his statement read.
He does not have the judicial temperament or character to be a Supreme Court judge, a lifetime position.
He was crying, screaming, and disrespectful during hearings. We all saw it happen live. If that had been a woman, she'd have likely been called hysterical or even crazy.
Regardless of the outcome of the investigation, his should step aside because of his outrageous, unflattering judicial behavior and multiple accounts of untoward behaviors in his past. This to save his family humiliation and the rest of us...from the anger and partisan attitude he exhibited and might continue to exhibit on the Supreme Court.
so you swa one day of the hearings, and have made the judgement that kavanaugh does not have a proper judicial temperament. never mind that he has been slandered for no good reason other than to try and force him to withdraw his nomination by a bunch of demonrats whose only purpose right now is to get rid of trump because they lost in 2016.
personally given what kavanaugh has been through in the past couple of weeks, and what his family has been through, i dont blame him.
The left is admitting it doesn't matter if he did it. Their new line is "he got mad when we accused him of it so he's unfit for office". They are conceding that the accusations themselves were just a means to end end when they say that.
The right wing's position is, "We don't care about ethics, conduct, demeanor, or honesty on the court. We have no standards for selecting a candidate. All we care about is winning." The Republican Party decades ago stood for law and order and integrity. That has been completely abandoned.
The left is admitting it doesn't matter if he did it. Their new line is "he got mad when we accused him of it so he's unfit for office". They are conceding that the accusations themselves were just a means to end end when they say that.
Had he not gotten angry at the accusations they'd be saying "if I got falsely accused of something like this I'd be mad as hell. Why isn't he angry? Someone with no human emotion is not fit to be a judge" or "He's not getting angry because he knows he's guilty".
It's literally "say anything" at this point.
Spot on!
Having dug his heels in, eventually, he will be vindicated.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.