Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And that is exactly why the The New York Times ran their story yesterday about President Trump: that much of this money came to him through dubious tax schemes he participated in during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud.
They are trying to discredit him. And if you can discredit him, you can discredit his decision to nominate Kavanaugh by further muddying the waters for those Senators on the fence!
When there's so much immoral, unethical, and illegal behavior going on, it's easy to connect the dots and see a conspiracy where there is none.
Fact is, Trump surrounds himself with people as shoddy as he is and yeah, it's ALL gonna come out. No conspiracy needed. Pull one loose thread and it all unravels.
If he's been "shown" to be innocent, why WOULDN'T his reputation be in the clear? The problem for him is just how enlightening all his behavior has been while trying to defend himself. I appreciate the opportunity to see how angry and biased he is - that's very good information to have. He's brought himself down.
Ah, yes, the next shiny object for liberals - anger issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reneeh63
When there's so much immoral, unethical, and illegal behavior going on, it's easy to connect the dots and see a conspiracy where there is none.
Fact is, Trump surrounds himself with people as shoddy as he is and yeah, it's ALL gonna come out. No conspiracy needed. Pull one loose thread and it all unravels.
And libs love to use that word conspiracy. How can you call something a conspiracy when you cannot prove whether or not it is a conspiracy to begin with?
Yeah, I don't get this part. The FBI is trying to determine if an accusation is true, and they don't interview the accuser?
at this point the focus is on whether or not Ford will be prosecuted or not. I hope they don't, this woman has some serious mental problems and that may put her over the edge.
It's true that none of her witnesses disagree with her statements.
99% of people who were there wouldn't agree anyhow. Imagine the loss of privacy and scrutiny.
Nothing to gain by anyone through corobortating her story. She'll stand alone, most likely.
Majority looks out for #1
Whether she is believed isn't the issue
It's how he cracked on the stand, his demeanor and his rage displayed
Not Supreme Court Judge material at all
His lying isn't helping him either
Next!
You fired up a new account to burp up this garbage? Oh, and threw in a bogus vote too?
We'll see how that goes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
