Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They scrubbed everything on Dr Ford. I went to the Palo Alto University site and searched for lectures by her. Nothing. Panels she may have been in, nothing, Rate My Professor, nothing. I would like to see a video of her speaking prior to this testimony. There is nothing out there. Somebody scrubbed her past completely. I'd be willing to bet her vocal fry and little girl voice is fake. She is playing mind games and useful idiots are falling for it.
Wouldn't archive.org still have a lot of that stuff?
Hmmm. Where was she when she drank this one beer? Downstairs? What kind of beer? Where? In the living room? Can she describe that? Do you see the issue with her description of the incident? I do.
Reminds me of the typical response you see people give to police officers when they are asked "have you had anything to drink tonight?"
You have to get to the end to read the truth, as is usual with the MSM:
Quote:
A White House official did not specifically dispute limitations on the scope of the FBI's investigation but denied the White House was “micromanaging” the inquiry.
White House spokesman Raj Shah said that "the scope and duration has been set by the Senate. The White House is letting the FBI agents do what they are trained to do.”
The Senate has only said that supplemental FBI background investigation “be limited to current credible allegations against the nominee and must be completed no later than one week from today.”
That's it. That is the limit that useless sites like Vox and MSM outlets are using to claim that the WH is "limiting" the investigation. Something that we already knew because Trump already stated, last week, that it was ONLY for allegations already on the table. They know the left would come out with more BS if they didn't put that on there, and you and all the other lefties know it, as well.
Will someone finally question CBF about her history of mental health (drinking/drugging, psychological trauma, therapies, medications, etc.).
Also, what about her about other traumatic events that may have contributed to her mental state, especially regarding her relationships with men (principally her father, husband, father figures(coaches), other boyfriends, etc).
However, if no one, the FBI, the Senate, or anyone else is going to breach the sanctuary of her mental health history, we will never know the truth.
The only way they’ll see this is if Ford agrees to it. They can’t force her but can note she said no. No subpoena power in this investigation just like people could refuse to be interviewed if they wanted.
Like I said, if he's smart he won't take it since they are so notorious for inaccurate results that they are inadmissible in court.
I shared on the other thread how I took one once - and failed it. Thankfully everyone in management knew I was innocent and I suffered no ramifications from it, but the polygraph administrator did tell me he wouldn't recommend that I ever submit to another one.
He’s already said he would if the committee wanted and likely has in the past given his clearances. I had to as well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
