Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
However, she never got any advantage from that even if she did list herself in a law professor's listing. The documents from her schools and confirm that they viewed her as a white woman.
And she did not LIE. She took her family's word on her heritage. I take my family's word also. Don't you?
Are you sure about that? She ran on it against Scott Brown. I provided that link earlier to the video. She doesn't come right out and say it, (something the left does a lot - never answers directly), but heavily implies (which is what the left does do a lot because they know that people make assumptions on implications).
We have seen this for a very long time - the left knows exactly what it's doing when implying a statement without ever saying the exact words - that way they can fool some of the people, and if called on it later, claim that they never said that. This is not a new strategy. It's manipulation. It's beginner's manipulation tactics, but apparently that's all the left needs to fool their own.
As for her lying, yes, she blatantly lied. Some story about being Cherokee does not give her the right to label herself as a minority. You have to have proof, especially if you're claiming NDN status, that you're a minority. The only thing she's ever claimed is Cherokee, therefore, when labeling herself a minority, with only a story to go on, she lied. Flat. Out. Lied.
Don't I take my family's word for it? No. I don't. I was told we have Choctaw. I did not take their word for it, I started researching ancestry to find out if we did or not. Further, I also did not claim to be Choctaw, never claimed to be a minority, never claimed to be a person of color, never asked for any special privileges, do not go around telling everyone that I'm Choctaw because someone in my family said so - because even if I had 50% Native blood, I haven't lived their life. I have not lived their culture. I have not lived their heritage. I never suffered. The majority of my family never suffered. It would be one person who did, not the rest of us, and there's no way in hell I would have the audacity to try to take advantage of that by calling myself a minority on lawyer register - which the only reason to do that is for personal gain.
Last edited by Three Wolves In Snow; 10-15-2018 at 07:02 PM..
Are you sure about that? She ran on it against Scott Brown. I provided that link earlier to the video. She doesn't come right out and say it, (something the left does a lot - never answers directly), but heavily implies (which is what the left does do a lot because they know that people make assumptions on implications).
We have seen this for a very long time - the left knows exactly what it's doing when implying a statement without ever saying the exact words - that way they can fool some of the people, and if called on it later, claim that they never said that. This is not a new strategy. It's manipulation. It's beginner's manipulation tactics, but apparently that's all the left needs to fool their own.
As for her lying, yes, she blatantly lied. Some story about being Cherokee does not give her the right to label herself as a minority. You have to have proof, especially if you're claiming NDN status, that you're a minority. The only thing she's ever claimed is Cherokee, therefore, when labeling herself a minority, with only a story to go on, she lied. Flat. Out. Lied.
Don't I take my family's word for it? No. I don't. I was told we have Choctaw. I did not take their word for it, I started researching ancestry to find out if we did or not. Further, I also did not claim to be Choctaw, never claimed to be a minority, never claimed to be a person of color, never asked for any special privileges, do not go around telling everyone that I'm Choctaw because someone in my family said so - because even if I had 50% Native blood, I haven't lived their life. I have not lived their culture. I have not lived their heritage. I never suffered. The majority of my family never suffered. It would be one person who did, not the rest of us, and there's no way in hell I would have the audacity to try to take advantage of that by calling myself a minority on lawyer register - which the only reason to do that is for personal gain.
You know, no one has shown any proof that she used her "status" to get into anywhere. But I can be convinced to think otherwise if they did provide such documentation.
You know, no one has shown any proof that she used her "status" to get into anywhere. But I can be convinced to think otherwise if they did provide such documentation.
BTW, her DNA tests confirm your video clip.
Again, DNA tests only show what is "likely", it does not actually show that she IS any part Native American.
What would be the point of labeling yourself a minority in a lawyer register if you're not a minority?
This is like if C. Thomas Howell from the movie Soul Man decided to run for president as a black man.
Or Rachel Dolezal ran as President of Spokane chapter of NAACP.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL.
