Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And WHEN there is peace in Iraq? When the vision for a peaceful and democratic Iraq comes to fruition? When, because of what happened there affects the whole middle east, in a positive way, not in your negative, pessimistic way? Then what? Will "W" get credit for that?
What will the historians say then?
I realize you HOPE none of this will come true for political reasons, and because you hate "W" so intensely. But the seeds have been sown.
"When " is a big word....hasn't been peace in the mideast in about 10, 000 years so I won't hold my breath. Then we can also ask ourselves was the price worth it...and of course, the bushworshipers who haven't been blown to death, haven't been maimed, who won't spend the rest of their life in a wheel chair, will say it was as they and their children and grandchildren pay for the war.
FleetQuote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! ""he mentioned "liberation" more often than "WMD."
He "mentioned' 9/11 more than anything. .
As I said, he mentioned liberation of Iraq more than WMD. That kind of shoots down the claim that Bush had Iraq invaded only because of WMD, as some claim.""""
So WHY did he wait until AFTER 9/11? WHY did he connect 9/11 to attacking Iraq?
IF he had legitimate reasons for attacking Iraq WHY did he need 9/11 ?
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
And WHEN there is peace in Iraq? When the vision for a peaceful and democratic Iraq comes to fruition? When, because of what happened there affects the whole middle east, in a positive way, not in your negative, pessimistic way? Then what? Will "W" get credit for that?
What will the historians say then?
.
Considering you fail to mention any benefit to the US I'd say the historians will say he accomplished little.
I don't particularly give a rat's behind if Iraq is democratic and free if al Qaeda is still roaming freely in any number of other countries.
For All You Bush Bashers U Should Know In 10-15 Yr.s He Will Look Back As Our Most Beloved. He Has Oldfashion Thinking What We Need.
another delusional bush lover, in 10 to 15years, his presdiential papers and documents will be released and then we'll see just how big of a criminal he really was
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Did I say peace in the middle east? I said Iraq at peace, which WILL affect the middle east.
Iraq was at peace before we invested so much blood and $$$$ for what?
Scum tho he was Saddam was also an enemy of al Qaeda and had no history of state sponsorship of terrorism aimed at the US, and presented no imminent threat. Maliki on the other hand was at one time a member of a party involved in attacks against US interests.
For All You Bush Bashers U Should Know In 10-15 Yr.s He Will Look Back As Our Most Beloved. He Has Oldfashion Thinking What We Need.
It's hard work
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
