Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wow ...
first it was true blondes dying off
now white people in general
next it will be males ..... as females will have less need for them.
They are already done with men. The traits of masculinity are no longer needed nor wanted in our society. Men are just a source of problems. Demasculinization will continue and eventually genetics engineering will eliminate men altogether. In a few decades we will be genederless. Genders are no longer needed.
Race will be eliminated at the same time. In our frantic drive to achieve what we consider fair, we must eliminate all distinct traits and make everyone the same. Only they can things really be fair.
Why do you think fertility rates are so high in impoverished countries?
Sex is a way to escape their plight. We kill ourselves with drugs and alcohol, they expand their families and send the kids north using the same routes the drugs go.
There is still a high volume of births by white people, the difference is, they are now being made with people of diverse ethnic, racial and cultural make up, as well as they are adopting children of all the various ethnicities. The number of white women, who are "single mother's increases because the women are no longer willing to live with or under white male nationalism, as they understand its not just about race, its about dominance over the female gender as well. They are no long willing to play the "role of being the female who submit to white male dominance, they no longer think their who life is based on whether a white man provides them financial support, as they have come to learn that financial support comes at a cost of their dignity an equal person. So, not only do they choose in a great many cases to be a single mother, not because they don't like men, but because they will not live within a arrangement where she is considered less than an equal. They are far more selective in their choosing, they will not submit to being a sex object and a heir producer who is otherwise regarded as being less than in human equality. They also realize, they are not as "fragile" as the idea was promoted in aims to strip from her, the capabilities of being an equal individual and equal person in society.
They no longer care to be seen as a Dress up doll, for the whims of male pleasure, when such game make her subservient and submit to being considered as not only less than, but seen in many cases as being a disposable object of pleasure, and dismissed if she becomes naturally aged, as if she is only considered is she is a young and act as playmate to the whims of male ego.
The reasons of the changes people see... is far more than to try and claim there is a reduction in white births, there is no reduction, they just choose to give births by and through diversity relations and not just limit and submit themselves to white male dominance... They don't detest their own race, but they do detest the though of pretending to be superior denies them the right to be a person who engages and lives and interact and interbreed with the diversity of the world.
People may not get the gist of things, but white women are no longer willing to be "physically assaulted" because they don't submit to the white male dominance, nor to have themselves and their family killed, because she stands up as an individual, and does not maintain a submission to the dominance of historical white males habits of thinking himself to be the owner of her as if she is his possession. The long history of "being a possession" is a detested concept in all womens minds in these days of life.
These are among the realities why some people's perceptions want to fight against the right of women to choose, which includes to choose mates based on her own desires and not the dictates and mandates of a long system of white male dominance... They no longer care about the "name calling" and "aims to denigrate her", because she chooses someone of a different ethnicity, or if she does not choose to marry at all. She will not submit to such labeling.
Today, many women make a conscience choice to be a "single mothers", because they refuse to submit into a system ideology that is of design to contain, control and diminish her as a equal human beings.
Last edited by Chance and Change; 01-11-2019 at 07:20 AM..
This will probably sound racist. Not my intent. But I think a lot of white families stress the importance of not having kids unless you can afford them. While some other groups think it's a blessing if their teenage kids have kids.
I have quite many friends who are white that have 0 kids. Why? They think about their future & realize it would only be tough proving for a family with out government assistance.
First of all it is not racist to state facts. While whites have more kids in totalality than blacks or browns, that is only because there are a lot more whites than either of those minority groups. Needless to say on a per capita basis, whites are having much less kids than those other two mentioned demographics.
^
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1
Did you even read the report? Every group is having less kids, Blacks aren't that far behind whites, and latinos aren't as well. White people are just much older so whites having less kids makes a bigger effect.
For whites its 1.66, blacks 1.83, Hispanic 2.03. Not that much difference.
I seriously question the stats, but lets go with them for the sake of argument. For a society/culture to sustain itself, every couple must produce 2.11 kids just to maintain it's numbers. Whites are obviously below that based on those figures, as are blacks & browns.
So if those figures were accurate, we are not producing enough kids to maintain our nation.
As to whites are waiting until older (thus not having that many kids), that might very well be true. However that would not factor into those stats beyond fewer kids regardless of reason. Between immigration (legal & illegal) and our society subsidizing lower income and less educated people to have children, white couples are in fact allowing themselves to be outbred.
While most people do not look at their own families in such ways, the long term effects of the aforementioned will have a distinct effect on our countries future culture.
A big problem for the US is that, due to the structure of Social Security, this accelerates the likelihood of soc. sec. going bust.
It's not just social security, it's our entire society. Social security, Medicare, nearly every pension plan, the stock market, your 401k, most businesses, your health insurance plan, etc all require constantly increasing populations and consumption to stay viable.
Wealthy or well white Protestant married women and or couples were the first to begin limiting the number of children. This going back to early 1900's when in Europe and USA they actively sought out and used various methods of family planning (birth control).
Though perhaps knowledge, methods and or merchandise were rudimentary compared to today, but there were condoms and various diaphragms on market. Charles Goodyear inadvertently gave a boost to such things by his vulcanization of rubber process. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Goodyear
Leaving aside unmarried women wanting to engage in sex without getting pregnant, wealthy/upper class married white Protestant women (with or without their husband's knowledge) had reasons for limiting their number of pregnancies. First and foremost was fact that childbirth remained a relatively dangerous thing for women up until modern antibiotics came about in general use (post WWII) that could deal with childbed fever.
Other reasons ranged from simply not wanting to have babies (not too uncommon when you consider many women were forced, pushed, shoved and or otherwise pushed into marriages), and or after producing a "heir and spare" many wives decided they'd finished with baby making.
Both married women and or couples of these upper classes saw what having a surplus of children did to a family's estates/fortunes, and that too many children simply depleted resources. Again thanks to birth control a couple didn't have to totally forgo that side of life.
Queen Victoria apparently liked having sexual relations with her husband Prince Albert very much. It was the natural outcome of that act (numerous pregnancies) she found distasteful. HM asked her doctors if there was a way she could have one without the other. Physicians mindful that Victoria was both their sovereign *and* head of CofE gave the standard "proper" advice on birth control; abstinence. To which QV replied ".... am I to have no more fun in bed?".
After Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra and their children were murdered their executioners helped themselves to the dead families possessions. Among the late Czar's things they found packets of condoms.
Note I keep referring to "Protestant" women and men because followers of that religion did not have to contend with the Roman Catholic Church and its doctrines/teachings regarding birth control and abortion. Thus all over Europe, North and South America it often was the Catholics who had large families. In modern times over the past forty or so years this is has changed.
Both here and elsewhere Irish, German, Italian, Austrian and others both women and married couples aren't interested in having large numbers of children just because the Church says they should. Hence the decreasing birth rates in many Catholic European countries, and also on this side of the pond as well.
Since their arrival onto these shores Catholics built large networks of schools which recently as the 1950's and through 1970's were packed with kids. Fast forward to now many of those schools are either closing or have closed. Ones that are still open in many areas are full mostly of non-white/European children whose parents find Catholic schools the cheapest private option.
Other wrinkle across the board is pretty solid evidence correlating higher education with females having fewer children.
If you overlay a graph of higher education, post graduate and early career years over a female's natural fertility the issue becomes clearer. A female's highest period of fertility occurs roughly over the same years as high school through college and first then or so years afterwards. Many women today, especially white/European are delaying marriage and or children until they've finished college , started and established themselves in a career. Which is fine and natural; but it often means they are well into their 30's before deciding to "settle down". By that time they may or may not even want children, and or for various reasons confine themselves to one or perhaps two.
Long story short in any event the die is cast; in many European countries and USA the number of "white European" females of child bearing age has fallen below required replacement levels.
White fertility rates below sustainable levels in almost all states. Maybe demographic change will come sooner than people expect?
Define white. I think we are all just blending into a different shade of pigment, perhaps a bit darker than the traditional Scandanavian white. As cultures blend and mix together, different colors emerge.
But it's also why we'll win in 2020, when Don the Con is out on his fat rump! BTW, I'm an older white guy who will be turning North Carolina a nice dark shade of Blue!
Why do you think the same failed strategy will work the next time?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
as females will have less need for them. 
Every group is having less kids, Blacks aren't that far behind whites, and latinos aren't as well. White people are just much older so whites having less kids makes a bigger effect.
