Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With liberals now celebrating the death of full grown babies at birth as a mother to be who is giving birth to a full term baby, now can decide at birth to have an abortion and have the baby lay there to die...
That's proof the Slippery Slope is not always a fallacy.
Liberals swore up and down abortions would be limited to the 1st Trimester, then next thing you know it's the 2nd Trimester, then partial-birth abortions, now this, and they're trying to make available for all Trimesters.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea
That's proof the Slippery Slope is not always a fallacy.
Liberals swore up and down abortions would be limited to the 1st Trimester, then next thing you know it's the 2nd Trimester, then partial-birth abortions, now this, and they're trying to make available for all Trimesters.
Excepting of course the OP provides nothing factual in support of the allegations made.
With liberals now celebrating the death of full grown babies at birth as a mother to be who is giving birth to a full term baby, now can decide at birth to have an abortion and have the baby lay there to die...
Do you trust any doctor who is willing to agree to have a perfectly healthy baby to die due to not feeding or caring for that baby?
Sorry, but any doctor who is willing to allow that to happen, to me is a doctor I want to stay far away from!
JMO!
Sure, and let us know if you hear of any such doctors. Okay?
With liberals now celebrating the death of full grown babies at birth as a mother to be who is giving birth to a full term baby, now can decide at birth to have an abortion and have the baby lay there to die...
Do you trust any doctor who is willing to agree to have a perfectly healthy baby to die due to not feeding or caring for that baby?
Sorry, but any doctor who is willing to allow that to happen, to me is a doctor I want to stay far away from!
JMO!
I wouldn't trust anyone who fed you this ^ nonsense!
Quote:
What's True
The New York state legislature passed a law allowing abortions after 24 weeks if the mother's health is at risk or there is an absence of fetal viability.
What's False
The law does not allow for unrestricted abortion up through the normal term of pregnancy.
That's proof the Slippery Slope is not always a fallacy.
Liberals swore up and down abortions would be limited to the 1st Trimester, then next thing you know it's the 2nd Trimester, then partial-birth abortions, now this, and they're trying to make available for all Trimesters.
The real slippery slope is when a mother dies because she was denied a life saving pregnancy termination!
Quote:
Performing a late-term abortion had previously been a felony in New York, which as the Syracuse Post-Standard observed, “had a chilling effect on doctors in New York who were reluctant to provide abortions after 24 weeks when the mother’s life was in danger or the fetus was no longer viable. In a widely reported case, one New York woman had to travel to Colorado to terminate her pregnancy.
With liberals now celebrating the death of full grown babies at birth as a mother to be who is giving birth to a full term baby, now can decide at birth to have an abortion and have the baby lay there to die...
Do you trust any doctor who is willing to agree to have a perfectly healthy baby to die due to not feeding or caring for that baby?
Sorry, but any doctor who is willing to allow that to happen, to me is a doctor I want to stay far away from!
JMO!
What is your definition of a "healthy baby"?? Just physically healthy and breathing on its own?
I am kind of puzzled here. If the mother doesn't want her baby after she gives birth to it... why not put it up for adoption? But if the baby is born with a birth defect such as Downs Syndrome, then so what if the baby is aborted? Or during the birthing process, there is brain damage due a complication, or the baby is discovered to have microcephaly from the mother having been infected with the Zika virus, then why should the parents and society have to be that baby's caretaker for their entire lives and at great cost to the family and society.
What is your definition of a "healthy baby"?? Just physically healthy and breathing on its own?
I am kind of puzzled here. If the mother doesn't want her baby after she gives birth to it... why not put it up for adoption? But if the baby is born with a birth defect such as Downs Syndrome, then so what if the baby is aborted? Or during the birthing process, there is brain damage due a complication, or the baby is discovered to have microcephaly from the mother having been infected with the Zika virus, then why should the parents and society have to be that baby's caretaker for their entire lives and at great cost to the family and society.
The same people who are against abortion, for any reason, are also against supporting the child's medical care.
This baby was rescued at birth. Medicaid paid for 22 months in an intensive care, countless surgeries, and will pay for his ongoing home care as the 22 month old is ventilator dependent and must get nutrition through a tube placed in his stomach.
Quote:
Jacob had a birth defect named omphalacele. His intestines, liver, and parts of his stomach were outside of his body.
Quote:
Jacob was born with undeveloped lungs, and months would be needed to expand and grow the extra skin he would need to eventually close his abdomen.
Quote:
Twenty-two months went by, the longest anyone at Medical City Dallas can remember for a preemie baby to finally get the chance to go home.
Unfortunately, I can't give out enough karma for just about every post in this thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu
What is your definition of a "healthy baby"?? Just physically healthy and breathing on its own?
I am kind of puzzled here. If the mother doesn't want her baby after she gives birth to it... why not put it up for adoption? But if the baby is born with a birth defect such as Downs Syndrome, then so what if the baby is aborted? Or during the birthing process, there is brain damage due a complication, or the baby is discovered to have microcephaly from the mother having been infected with the Zika virus, then why should the parents and society have to be that baby's caretaker for their entire lives and at great cost to the family and society.
Because even developmentally-disabled people are human beings?
But that's not what this is about.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
