Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I could go on and on, frankly, just about forever.
Health laws, such as laws requiring restaurants to be clean and pass inspection, are socialist. Restaurant owners aren't violent and are not running a scam, so according to your reasoning, health laws like that are socialist.
How about laws protecting rare and endangered species? Heck, they aren't even protecting people, so surely they must be socialist.
What about building codes in buildings? They are not violent crimes or scams, so according to you, they must be socialist.
I could go on and on, frankly, just about forever.
Health laws, such as laws requiring restaurants to be clean and pass inspection, are socialist. Restaurant owners aren't violent and are not running a scam, so according to your reasoning, health laws like that are socialist.
How about laws protecting rare and endangered species? Heck, they aren't even protecting people, so surely they must be socialist.
What about building codes in buildings? They are not violent crimes or scams, so according to you, they must be socialist.
Your criteria are utterly ridiculous.
All need to be abolished.
It’s ridiculous to believe these laws do any good.
Why are socialists accepting Pelosi, Blumenthal, Kerry and so many other, super rich Democrats?
Democrats are a center right political party real socialists hate them.
When you drive a car on public roads, you are putting other people in danger.
When you walk out into public with a cold or flu or some other communicable disease, you are putting other people in danger. You could also use that potentially dangerous automobile to crash into someone and injure them, thus needing hospitalization. It's odd you think it's OK for the damages to the car to be protected by law, but not the damages to the people inside the cars.
Thus, I could use your own criteria to make a case for universal health insurance.
Not by definition, no. That's called income re-distribution.
I know that when your entire knowledge based comes from talk radio, things like this may be hard to fathom.
And is a tenet of socialism.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
