Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey, who was nominated to the federal bench by Obama in 2014, ruled that Protect Our Parks has standing to sue the city because it represents taxpayers with concerns that providing land in Jackson Park to the Obama center violates their due process rights.
Last edited by phma; 02-19-2019 at 06:00 PM..
Reason: ADD WORD, spelling
So you are saying its OK for Obama who would personally benefit but its not Ok for Trump even when there is no personal benefit.
LOL. Would personally benefit? Not really. Its a freaking library, its not like he is funneling money into his own pockets via charging the secret service to use carts.
The lawsuits reasonable, its Chicago trying to do things they shouldn't have shortcuted on. The judge has a 45 day discovery, and will make a rapid judgement. This is perfectly fine, and they will either succeed or fail. Looking at it if I were a resident of Chicago id be pissed about the 175 million bill for moving roads around.
And if you think Trump doesn't have some grift going on with the wall you really arent paying attention to him. Odds are he is getting something from the group he has probably already chosen to build the wall.
So you are saying its OK for Obama who would personally benefit but its not Ok for Trump even when there is no personal benefit. Is that it ?
That's that Democrat double standard.
And, more laughably. Mention "anything" like the hapless community agitatior and the NPCs will always respond with Orange Man Bad. This topic has nothing to do with Trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar
...
And if you think Trump doesn't have some grift going on with the wall you really arent paying attention to him. Odds are he is getting something from the group he has probably already chosen to build the wall.
LOL. Would personally benefit? Not really. Its a freaking library, its not like he is funneling money into his own pockets via charging the secret service to use carts.
The lawsuits reasonable, its Chicago trying to do things they shouldn't have shortcuted on. The judge has a 45 day discovery, and will make a rapid judgement. This is perfectly fine, and they will either succeed or fail. Looking at it if I were a resident of Chicago id be pissed about the 175 million bill for moving roads around.
And if you think Trump doesn't have some grift going on with the wall you really arent paying attention to him. Odds are he is getting something from the group he has probably already chosen to build the wall.
You almost had me until you went with the unfounded accusation and into the TDS zone.
I was saved by reality again. That's getting freaky with frequency.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe 
