Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And, there is zero basis in law for this argument:The law itself is very broadly written. "actually guilty of illegal collusion" is NOT - repeat - IS NOT - a prerequisite to an investigation as countless judicial experts have said publicly. No wonder Trump likes Barr. He, too, lives in his own self-created reality.
Mr. Nixon had his 'Saturday Night Massacre' perhaps Mr. Trump is attempting to get 'one up' on him, so to speak?
His whole administration has been outlandish & a fiasco. (& not in a good way)
It's obvious the president hired Barr for that very reason just as he nominates or hires people (judges, IRS) that are loyal to him. A mob boss mentality.
The New York families wanted nothing to do with him, too messed up for them. That's why he had to get mixed up with the Russian families.
Washed up Reality TV Show Host turned POTUS? Will wonders never cease.
And, there is zero basis in law for this argument:The law itself is very broadly written. "actually guilty of illegal collusion" is NOT - repeat - IS NOT - a prerequisite to an investigation as countless judicial experts have said publicly.
What? The other person was not talking about "prerequisites" for "investigations"; he was talking about the commission of a crime. The lack of an underlying crime means there couldn't be any corrupt motive in firing Comey (who told Trump specifically that Trump was not under investigation).
Clearly, you believe the president is exonerated, he didn't lie about Russian contacts many times and there was no Russian interference in the election.
Lying about Russian contacts (if he did that) was not illegal and was not something to be investigated. And, that's right, there was no Russian interference in the election.
The memo had ZERO to do with any opinion about the propriety of any probe. It was entirely about the law that applies to the findings of the probe.
What the heck are you talking about? His 19 page memo, dated June 2018, re: Mueller's "Obstruction" Theory cites Mr. Mueller 55 times.
It is ALL his opinion about Mr. Mueller's investigative processes. At that time he knew ZERO about Mr. Mueller's fact patterns, evidence, & there were no findings at that time.
It was a job interview for a washed up Reality TV Show Host.
What the heck are you talking about? His 19 page memo, dated June 2018, re: Mueller's "Obstruction" Theory cites Mr. Mueller 55 times.
It is ALL his opinion about Mr. Mueller's investigative processes. At that time he knew ZERO about Mr. Mueller's fact patterns, evidence, & there were no findings at that time.
Everything you wrote is false, except that there were no findings at the time and maybe the 55 times thing. There is nothing about Mueller's "investigative processes", and why would it be relevant (if true) that "he knew ZERO about Mr. Mueller's fact patterns, evidence, & there were no findings at that time"? The law is the law, and it is never necessary to know ANY facts before you state the law.
Everything you wrote is false, except that there were no findings at the time and maybe the 55 times thing. There is nothing about Mueller's "investigative processes", and why would it be relevant (if true) that "he knew ZERO about Mr. Mueller's fact patterns, evidence, & there were no findings at that time"? The law is the law, and it is never necessary to know ANY facts before you state the law.
He didn't just "state the law" he cited case law. Case law "is the law is the law" as established by the outcome of former cases.
Mr. Mueller needed to determine the facts based on interviews, review of evidence, etc. in order to make conclusions.
Mr. Barr jumped the gun because there were no findings, conclusions, &/or summary of evidence at the time he wrote his memo.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
