Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2019, 05:08 AM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,977,786 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

The patent system should be revised in this country.
There are a lot of abusers that use it to beyond what it was intended for.
There are companies that patent generic drugs to make bank.

Also, patents are big business using the government to rig the capitalist market in their favor.

In free market capitalism patents would not exist.
If I can make something better or cheaper than you, then I just put you out of business.

Do away with patents in the pharma industry and watch the prices fall when competition kicks in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2019, 05:12 AM
 
8,377 posts, read 3,865,414 times
Reputation: 6003
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
There are companies that patent generic drugs to make bank.
Do you have an example of this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
Do away with patents in the pharma industry and watch the prices fall when competition kicks in.
Agreed. And a major slowdown in the creation of new medicine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 05:13 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,716,492 times
Reputation: 15343
I think its ridiculous the patent office can suppress certain things, under the 'Invention Secrecy Act...I wonder why these do not expire after 20 yrs!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 05:15 AM
 
8,377 posts, read 3,865,414 times
Reputation: 6003
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
I think its ridiculous the patent office can suppress certain things, under the 'Invention Secrecy Act...I wonder why these do not expire after 20 yrs!!
National security is why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 05:20 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,716,492 times
Reputation: 15343
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000 View Post
National security is why.
So, the patent office suppressing 1000s of patents related to vehicles, engines, transportation, etc is protecting national security?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 08:54 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,230,524 times
Reputation: 17866
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000 View Post
Yes, and your examples include research driven results ....

We are talking about round corners on a rectangle. LOL I had calculators in the 80's with round corners. Are you seriously trying to defend this patent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 02:14 PM
 
1,065 posts, read 476,795 times
Reputation: 949
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
We are talking about round corners on a rectangle. LOL I had calculators in the 80's with round corners. Are you seriously trying to defend this patent?
As the other poster said, it's not an absurd patent. It may be invalid based on precedent (and that's, perhaps, why it was re-reviewed and, later, declined). But if that precedent didn't exist, it would be a valid. It's not like Apple just made a decision on the whim... they did the research behind it and determined a solution that works best. That's what patents protect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 03:32 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,230,524 times
Reputation: 17866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldgorilla View Post
As the other poster said, it's not an absurd patent.

Without exaggeration people have been rounding corners on things since the stone age whether it was for looks, ergonomics or other things. A most recent example nearly identical to the pjone would be a 1980's calculator that could have similar design, shape and size.





Quote:
It may be invalid based on precedent (and that's, perhaps, why it was re-reviewed and, later, declined).
It was included in their lawsuit against Samsung and a few other things that were highly questionable. A 5 year legal battle that cost Samsung a stupendous amount of money in legal fees alone. Legal fees Joe Schmoe cannot afford.



Quote:
That's what patents protect.
Patents are intended to protect someone from having their work stolen by someone, unique and functional ideas. They were not intended to be used to protect against something people have been doing for thousands of years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 04:27 PM
 
7,343 posts, read 4,404,114 times
Reputation: 7664
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
The patent system should be revised in this country.
There are a lot of abusers that use it to beyond what it was intended for.
There are companies that patent generic drugs to make bank.

Also, patents are big business using the government to rig the capitalist market in their favor.

In free market capitalism patents would not exist.
If I can make something better or cheaper than you, then I just put you out of business.

Do away with patents in the pharma industry and watch the prices fall when competition kicks in.
You have no idea what you are talking about. What's worse is, you are convinced that you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,620 posts, read 19,249,558 times
Reputation: 21746
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
In many countries, patent holders must periodically prove that they're actually using the patent. Not so in the US.

This means that it's difficult to innovate without a high risk of ending up in court being sued for patent infringement of patents that were filed with zero intention of actually materializing onto the market. Instead, it's used as a money trap for future innovators who might invent something even tangentially related.

Do you think this squelches human progress and that the government should stop backing patent hoarders?
It worked for Edison.

Edison didn't actually invent the light bulb, he just bought up a bunch of patents on light bulbs and tinkered with them until he got one that worked the way he wanted it to work.

Perhaps you should lay blame on the people who carelessly sell their patents for next to nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top