370 federal prosecutors agree that Mueller’s evidence is obstruction (Representatives, Congress, 9/11)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The evidence would have been sufficient for an indictment apart from the absurd DOJ policy that the president is above the law that Mueller felt he had to follow.
How can we fix this?
I realize this has not been given great consideration before since he haven’t had a president so willfully hostile to our laws and system of government before but this has to change.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude
Yes I’m saying that the fact that first part is true is unacceptable. And we need to change that.
Well, the DoJ position is only policy and not law, so there's that. n Perhaps it's time people flood the Email accounts of their Congressional representatives demanding the obstructor be indicted, or their representatives replaced.
The problem with your "absurd DOJ policy that Mueller felt he had to follow" analysis is that Mueller specifically said his conclusion (or lack thereof) was not impacted by the DOJ policy. He was still free to recommend prosecution even if he was not free to bring the indictment himself.
So to answer your question, here's what you do: either impeach him and remove him from office, or vote him out in 2020. If neither happens, then what those 370 signatories think doesn't amount to a pile of swamp mud.
There are probably 500 Conservative Prosecutors who disagree.
Luckily we don't let all these people have a vote. If we did Hillary would also be in Jail.
You missed the point. The only person who's vote mattered in regards to the investigation, Mueller's, also clearly thought that the behavior amounted to obstruction but he felt he couldn't do anything since current DOJ policy is that the POTUS is above the law.
It may take a future POTUS and DOJ to rescind that policy but it needs to be done, no one can be above the law.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
