Who, in your life, would you be willing to sacrifice to keep your guns? (accuse, soldier)

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

Op is such a racist..

My friend if asked the question would be "my child" because one night in their rural area a career felon tried to break in and rape\rob\assault them with their young child home. Without a gun to defend themselves, police were 30+ minutes away.

The OP, and other posters, utter lack of diversity and ability to think of anyone living a different life than their own is the real problem.

Rich people, living in very safe areas with police 2 minutes away, not grasping how people live in the rest of the country. Such ignorance and again, utter lack of appreciation for diversity in all it's forms.

But hey, they need a scapegoat for 75% of the murder rate that happens in urban areas and disproportionately to minorities because of economics. Low paying jobs, lack of opportunity. Their solution? Allow millions of illegal workers to help keep such jobs low paying while blaming the problem all on everybody else.

Go back and read the OP post again. Note I did not ask who needs to die before you would fight for gun bans. Rather I wrote, "GUN CONTROL."

[redwood66]

Originally Posted by jojajn

Who is stock-piling?

Most of the mass shooters stock piled.

Then there is this:



https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...e-guns/500564/

LOL Super Owners.

[.sparrow.]

Originally Posted by redwood66

LOL Super Owners.

Who wrote that article, Hillary Clinton?

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by reed067

I have TWO guns I lose nothing.

No, you've lost, just accept it.

Originally Posted by reed067

I know enough about guns to know what you have. I’m pro-gun if that fact hasn’t been lost on you. Something tells me it has.

So, people can have guns that are not for killing? You do understand what you just said kill's your entire argument.....will you accept that?

Originally Posted by reed067

I’m pointing out that none NEEDS to open carry a fully automatic weapon out in public. I’m sure you’re lost again.

Can you give us any links to anyone in the last 50 years that has used a FULLY automatic weapon or carried a fully auto weapon?



We shall all wait.......

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by jojajn

Number of vehicles is needed to determine ratio.

So, more people have been killed by cars, proven, yet you need a ratio?



SAD........

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by jojajn

Whatever other purpose would a gun have other than killing or maiming?

Food....shooting targets....you've failed again, how does it feel?

[T-310]

Originally Posted by PedroMartinez

Killing innocent silhouettes, pieces of paper and clay.

How many dots on paper must be shot before we put an end to this?

The horror!!!

[PedroMartinez]

Originally Posted by T-310

The horror!!!

It is horror.

Do you know how long it's been since I shot sporting clays or 5-stand?

[Spottednikes]

I'll agree with gun confiscation under 2 conditions...

1) prove that the new gun law/ban would have prevented all of the mass shootings in last 15 yrs.

2) That all criminal's guns have been confiscated and there is no way for them to obtain another.

Until then, i'm keeping my guns.

[OpinionInOcala]

I wouldn't advocate for an ill-conceived abrogation of fundamental rights regardless. The OP's attempt to evoke an emotional response to the prospect of personal tragedy so-as to garner support for bad legislation is something I find decidedly more frightening than the statistical rarity of a lunatic wielding a semi-automatic firearm.