Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'll never fight for gun control. Cars are much more effective in mass murder. You can just drive full speed on a busy sidewalk and kill far more people than you can with guns. Just because you can kill people with cars doesn't mean you should ban them. If you want to fight for gun control then you have to fight to control everything that people use to kill each other.
I'll never fight for gun control. Cars are much more effective in mass murder. You can just drive full speed on a busy sidewalk and kill far more people than you can with guns. Just because you can kill people with cars doesn't mean you should ban them. If you want to fight for gun control then you have to fight to control everything that people use to kill each other.
As you probably saw coming, no one here that owns a gun seems to be able to think rationally on what "Enough" is.
They either dont have any family and friends and they are lone wolfers, or they dont care about family.
But they wont be honest and admit which family member has to get gunned down by a family member for them to decide theres a problem. I guess they can never talk about what would make them emotional because it would show weakness, even when it involves family, and it wont be consistent with they have been saying all along. Not even on a forum where it wont make a difference. This country is doomed because of these people.
As long as they have their guns, they dont have to care.
They are incapable of being honest about this subject.
Out of one side of the mouth of those of your ilk tell people no one is coming for their guns. Out of the other side your kind insult people for wanting to have guns. Yet, you accuse gun owners of being "incapable of being honest about this subject."
So, people can have guns that are not for killing? You do understand what you just said kill's your entire argument.....will you accept that?
Can you give us any links to anyone in the last 50 years that has used a FULLY automatic weapon or carried a fully auto weapon?
We shall all wait.......
Do you even read people’s posts or just spit out whatever comes into your mind? That would explain a lot of what you post. Which is 99.9% dribble. I never said used there are pictures of people carrying fully automatic weapons. Go look for yourself that way you can deny it and feel good about it. I repped your arse for saying that rifles are mostly for hunting. That’s a mistake I won’t make again.
Again a handgun is one thing but something like an AR-15, etc is overkill.
Not when I am traveling across country.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reed067
I have TWO guns I lose nothing. I know enough about guns to know what you have. I’m pro-gun if that fact hasn’t been lost on you. Something tells me it has. I’m pointing out that none NEEDS to open carry a fully automatic weapon out in public. I’m sure you’re lost again.
Who is carrying a fully automatic weapon out in public aside from the police?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Missed by 100 years....
