Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nancy is right...all roads do lead back to Russia and Putin. Trump constantly does inexplicable things that helps make Russia great again. If it were Obama doing this stuff the GOP would be losing their minds right now.
Nancy is right...all roads do lead back to Russia and Putin. Trump constantly does inexplicable things that helps make Russia great again. If it were Obama doing this stuff the GOP would be losing their minds right now.
That doesnt answer the question. How exactly is Putin the leader of anyone who voted for Trump? Lets say for instance that the big conspiracy theory about Trump and Putin were correct and Trump was secretly taking orders from Putin. That would mean that Putin was also the leader of the US and hence, would be your leader as well. So how would Putin be the leader of only those who voted for Trump?
That doesnt answer the question. How exactly is Putin the leader of anyone who voted for Trump? Lets say for instance that the big conspiracy theory about Trump and Putin were correct and Trump was secretly taking orders from Putin. That would mean that Putin was also the leader of the US and hence, would be your leader as well. So how would Putin be the leader of only those who voted for Trump?
One can run a puppet government with a puppet military, just like the Kremlin did with Cuba.
IT doesn't matter how we characterize it...here;s the deal
A State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email account found no widespread effort by her aides or other staffers to mishandle classified information.
That's the end of the story
So this proves she's not a warmongering crook somehow? I think not.
Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong. In fact, if she'd been elected president and continued to use a home computer to conduct high level government business that would have been perfectly fine.
That was never the story in the first place, so how can it be the end of the story? The case was made for gross negligence, not deliberate mishandling of classified information.
Newsweek is just taking a single statement from the report, and trying to pass it off as evidence of innocence to fool you guys. It seems to be working. We know Comey changed the original wording from negligence to extreme carelessness, so that there would be no charges. Never once did anyone charge that she was deliberately trying to risk our national security, just that her incompetence was putting it at risk.
Then there are the emails that “accidentally” got deleted after they were subpoenaed. If any of us destroyed evidence after it was subpoenaed, and then said “oopsy”, we would be in jail.
After 30 years of investigating Hillary without finding enough evidence of anything to charge her, you'd think the right wingers would have something better to do with their time.
After 30 years of investigating Hillary without finding enough evidence of anything to charge her, you'd think the right wingers would have something better to do with their time.
Never once did anyone charge that she was deliberately trying to risk our national security, just that her incompetence was putting it at risk.
Her original excuse was laziness... In any event this wasn't incompetence, the purpose of that server was so they could physically control the communications. She willfully put top secrets at risk for her own reasons.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.