Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The guy is seriously saying that a US President should not be asking a foreign leader to initiate an investigation into the US President's political rivals. It is self-serving, and it compromises the office of the President of the United States as well as any diplomatic efforts the United States might want to put forth.
It is indeed troubling that President Trump did this, and that his supporters don't understand why it is wrong.
We’ve all read the call colonel, you may of been concerned, others were not concerned. It’s a matter of opinion at this point, we can debate whether Trump should or shouldn’t of made the call but calling for impeachment and saying this is a high crime is laughable. Thankfully impeachment has 0% chance and we have an election next year to let the people decide.
If Trump withheld strategic aid or was leveraging diplomatic favors like White House meetings (as has been testified to thus far) in exchange for the opening of an investigation into Biden, then Trump jeopardized US national security for personal gain. I know you don't care, but the majority of Americans should (and do).
Again, this is something Biden talked openly about, this wasn’t Trump digging for dirt, this was him looking into something Biden openly admitted doing.
The guy is seriously saying that a US President should not be asking a foreign leader to initiate an investigation into the US President's political rivals. It is self-serving, and it compromises the office of the President of the United States as well as any diplomatic efforts the United States might want to put forth.
It is indeed troubling that President Trump did this, and that his supporters don't understand why it is wrong.
well.... the above isn't witness testimony. the above is an opinion. one shared by many people. YOU for instance agree with the opinion; however, does that mean you should go testify before Adam Shifts Star Chamber?
the only thing Mr. Vindman has done is confirm the transcript that was released.
i am curious as to why this matters in the least? A guy has a political difference with the President of the United States of America... There is a saying used in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area that comes from the local Sports Radio station: "Look out that window"...
If Trump withheld strategic aid or was leveraging diplomatic favors like White House meetings (as has been testified to thus far), then Trump jeopardized US national security for personal gain. I know you don't care, but the majority of Americans should (and do).
Democrats have done what you just mentioned, I’m seeing reports that aid to Ukraine was not stopped. It’s obvious this impeachment is purely political
Sondland puts his interests above country.
Vindman puts countries interests about self.
Bone spurs was never presidential material. He's a silver spoon, me first fibber with many glaring personality disorders. Enablers of bone spurs will reap what they sow. Pence would be an acceptable replacement in many ways, though he seems to have become increasingly enamored with the good life and wealth generation for one who wears his faith like a badge of honor.
Oh, you weren't referencing Hillary with that post? OK, I'll bite. Who were you talking about then?
I was talking about hypocrites.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.