Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They will question him under oath about how the whole thing was orchestrated by Schiff. If they don’t get to question him now, they will in the Senate trial.
What evidence is there that this was "orchestrated by Schiff"? Schiff made the President and Rudy do what they reportedly did? Schiff convinced all these witnesses to lie? What is the accusation here and what is the impact?
Why would they not want THEIR KEY WITNESS to testify? We need to hear from this guy if they plan to use him as the reason to impeach a sitting President who hasn't committed any actual crimes or broken any laws.
Why would they not want THEIR KEY WITNESS to testify? We need to hear from this guy if they plan to use him as the reason to impeach a sitting President who hasn't committed any actual crimes or broken any laws.
That's where you've made your mistake. The whistleblower is not their "key witness". He/she isn't really a witness of any kind, actually.
Why would they not want THEIR KEY WITNESS to testify? We need to hear from this guy if they plan to use him as the reason to impeach a sitting President who hasn't committed any actual crimes or broken any laws.
Using taxpayer money to shake down another president for personal favors is illegal. Do you really think that all presidents should be allowed to do this? This is 1000X more serious than consensual sex with a Whitehouse intern.
What evidence is there that this was "orchestrated by Schiff"? Schiff made the President and Rudy do what they reportedly did? Schiff convinced all these witnesses to lie? What is the accusation here and what is the impact?
"What evidence is there that this was "orchestrated by Schiff"?" Broaden where you get your "news", and you will find out!
That's where you've made your mistake. The whistleblower is not their "key witness". He/she isn't really a witness of any kind, actually.
"That's where you've made your mistake." That is where THEY made THEIR MISTAKE."He/she isn't really a witness of any kind, actually." BINGO! Yet they CLAIMED he, and it IS a he, which is what started the whole charade.
Using taxpayer money to shake down another president for personal favors is illegal. Do you really think that all presidents should be allowed to do this? This is 1000X more serious than consensual sex with a Whitehouse intern.
" This is 1000X more serious than consensual sex with a Whitehouse intern." Thank you for your biased opinion!
"What evidence is there that this was "orchestrated by Schiff"?" Broaden where you get your "news", and you will find out!
And WE are called the "UN-educated"!
Got a link or two that would "educate" me? If you're referring to the whistleblower contacting Schiff's office and then being redirected to the IG, that's not evidence of anything.
"That's where you've made your mistake." That is where THEY made THEIR MISTAKE."He/she isn't really a witness of any kind, actually." BINGO! Yet they CLAIMED he, and it IS a he, which is what started the whole charade.
Nope. No one claimed that. The report never made any claims of 1st-hand evidence by the whistleblower.
" This is 1000X more serious than consensual sex with a Whitehouse intern." Thank you for your biased opinion!
Clinton's affair with an intern didn't affect our national security.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.