Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-10-2019, 05:43 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,858,535 times
Reputation: 9283

Advertisements

The reason they don't want questions because they KNOW it will make the Democrats look like idiots and undermine their entire case... Look at the anti-Trumpers making BS excuses...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2019, 05:47 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,019,409 times
Reputation: 8567
Whistleblower isn’t needed.

They call attention to information. It’s the information that matters. I’m this case government records.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Texas
2,005 posts, read 762,185 times
Reputation: 2553
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
What is there to question the whistleblower about? His/her reports were all 2nd hand, or further removed. His/her credibility is irrelevant - there are multiple testimonies from first hand participants at this point.
I think it’s important to understand why classified information was being passed around the White House like water cooler talk by career govt employees. Why didn’t he direct any of these people with first hand knowledge to report it? Why didn’t any of the witnesses thus far report it? Why did the WB immediately run to Schiffs office for guidance, and not use his chain of command within his own agency? Just to name a few.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,393,510 times
Reputation: 9974
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
What is there to question the whistleblower about? His/her reports were all 2nd hand, or further removed. His/her credibility is irrelevant - there are multiple testimonies from first hand participants at this point.
They will question him under oath about how the whole thing was orchestrated by Schiff. If they don’t get to question him now, they will in the Senate trial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,216,524 times
Reputation: 8537
The list itself does not defend Trump at all.

Nunes and Jordan seem to be trying to get TV time for themselves when they get their 5 minutes after the 90 minutes of Staff Attorney questions.

Will anyone be watching after the Staff Attorney's are done, I think not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:07 AM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,011,664 times
Reputation: 10410
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiftymh View Post
They will question him under oath about how the whole thing was orchestrated by Schiff. If they don’t get to question him now, they will in the Senate trial.

Did Mr. Schiff orchestra the phone call? Did Schiff hold back the money Congress appropriated to Ukraine? Did Schiff tell the White House staff (Mulvaney, etc) to not testify (you know, the people that would most logically be able to defend Mr. Trump).


It is all fantasy. Even if there is a Senate trial, the trial will have to be restricted to the Articles of Impeachment. The thought that the Chief Justice would allow questioning of Schiff, the whistleblower, Hillary Clinton, Biden (young and old) is laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,846,967 times
Reputation: 41863
If we sweep everything else out of the way, there is one very important reason NOT to expose the WB...…...they would be risking having their life, or their families lives, in danger. There are a lot of nutjobs out there, as we saw when Dr. Ford testified against Kavanaugh. She had to go underground because of death threats against her and her family, who didn't even have anything to do with it.

We have the WB protection statute because of that very reason. If we do not protect people who have some information to share, they will stay silent, out of fear. Do we really want to turn ourselves into the Mafia, where snitches are found floating in the East River ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:13 AM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,559,282 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
Even if there is a Senate trial, the trial will have to be restricted to the Articles of Impeachment. The thought that the Chief Justice would allow questioning of Schiff, the whistleblower, Hillary Clinton, Biden (young and old) is laughable.
The Senate sets their own rules and after the partisan nonsense that is the house rules, you can bet Republicans will be looking to put their thumbs on the scale in the Senate.

I doubt Hillary would be called, but you can bet on Ciaramella and Hunter Biden. There's no scenario where they wouldn't be called. I think it's likely Joe Biden would be called as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:16 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenBouy View Post
I think it’s important to understand why classified information was being passed around the White House like water cooler talk by career govt employees. Why didn’t he direct any of these people with first hand knowledge to report it? Why didn’t any of the witnesses thus far report it? Why did the WB immediately run to Schiffs office for guidance, and not use his chain of command within his own agency? Just to name a few.....



Careful now, you're going to make some of these lefties/libs/dems use their brains....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2019, 06:17 AM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,559,282 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
If we sweep everything else out of the way, there is one very important reason NOT to expose the WB...…...they would be risking having their life, or their families lives, in danger. There are a lot of nutjobs out there, as we saw when Dr. Ford testified against Kavanaugh. She had to go underground because of death threats against her and her family, who didn't even have anything to do with it.
He's not informing on a Clinton, he'll be fine.

Also, the fact that you've had so many partisans come forward with outright lies like Christine Blasey Ford is exactly why the propagandist leaker needs to be publicly cross examined under oath.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top