Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Stay tuned, and pay close attention. The witnesses this week are merely the ones getting the casket ready. Next week we will see witnesses start driving nails.
We have been staying tuned for 3 years....
Driving nails...Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.. .the 2 star witnesses were yesterday....
For President Trump to explain why he fired Yovanovitch on twitter is evidence of witness intimidation.
Comrade Chairman Schiffanovitch...
This isn't a grand jury or a criminal trial if it was either there wouldn't questions & answers about her hurt feelings.
Another witness that witnessed nothing except getting fired for being a partisan, incompetent ambassador.
Translation - That's what you call defending yourself !!!
You go Trump !!! Where republicans have never gone before !!!
If the witness was intimidated it was done by the action shifty Schiff took to read the tweet !!!
Shifty Schiff is trying to intimidate the witness and a fact witness in his own proceeding !!!
What a buffoon !!!
First of all the tweet would have to be intimidating to begin with, and it clearly was not. Intimidation would be something like: "If she mentions this then I'll do this or that." His tweet was basically: "She did a bad job."
Yes, maybe you also need your edification...from your own link:
Thanks for proving yourself and your buddies wrong....
Or maybe they are not wrong. We all know that when State News goes against the boss--it has to be pretty bad. Trying to defend the indefensible must be exhausting.
"...Fox News anchors described the testimony of Maria Yovanovitch as a “turning point” in the impeachment inquiry against Trump...
...Anchor Bret Baier predicted that Trump’s tweet smearing Yovanovitch’s reputation as the longtime diplomat testified would lead to a new article of impeachment against the president..."
Trump bashes those he is afraid of. Yovanovich, a career American diplomat of exemplary esteem who has worked for our government satisfactorily for 33 years under both parties, specifically as an anti-corruption watchdog, mysteriously gets fired by Trump around the time of this phone call in which Trump asks the president of the Ukraine for this personal political favor in exchange for the military aid. Meanwhile, Trump is tweeting the praises of corrupt presidents while bashing her as ineffective. I'm sure it was a complete and utter coincidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Translation - That's what you call defending yourself !!!
Defending himself from what? The most powerful man in the world is so afraid of a diplomat he has to defend himself from a woman he never met or talked to? Why would that be? I can think of one reason. . . What's yours?
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
You go Trump !!! Where republicans have never gone before !!!
Impeachment is a real Republican accomplishment. A special notch on Trump's bedpost!
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
If the witness was intimidated it was done by the action shifty Schiff took to read the tweet !!!
So reading a Tweet is bullying now? I can see you thinking that considering Trump doesn't read any of his advisor's briefings or anything at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Shifty Schiff is trying to intimidate the witness and a fact witness in his own proceeding !!!
What a buffoon !!!
Asking questions is bullying too? You must lead a very sheltered life.
Stay tuned, and pay close attention. The witnesses this week are merely the ones getting the casket ready. Next week we will see witnesses start driving nails.
Do you ever get tired of being consistently wrong?
cueball Stay tuned, and pay close attention. The witnesses this week are merely the ones getting the casket ready. Next week we will see witnesses start driving nails.
He only enjoys them if he thinks he can browbeat someone into submission. It won't work for him this time.
He's very afraid, with good reason.
Well, I'm not so sure, but we will see.
As for the witnesses next week, people saying "bombshells will drop." Who testifies next week that will provide a more credible proof piecing this altogether?
Or maybe they are not wrong. We all know that when State News goes against the boss--it has to be pretty bad. Trying to defend the indefensible must be exhausting.
"...Fox News anchors described the testimony of Maria Yovanovitch as a “turning point” in the impeachment inquiry against Trump...
...Anchor Bret Baier predicted that Trump’s tweet smearing Yovanovitch’s reputation as the longtime diplomat testified would lead to a new article of impeachment against the president..."
A "New" article of impeachment? LOL. You do realize that the next article of impeachment against Trump will be the first article of impeachment against Trump, as there are not currently any articles of impeachment against Trump.
Nor have we even heard a specific charge which could legitimately be the basis for one. The idea that a tweet by him about this woman could be impeachable may truly be the most stupid suggestion we have heard during this entire absurd exercise. And that is really saying something.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
