Trump’s Sec. of Defense Fires the Sec. of Navy (suspected, wisdom)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you have a problem with the orders of the President of the United States as a subordinate US government/military officer, your recourse is to resign. Not to be insubordinate.
This just goes to show how deep the "resistance" goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha
Exactly.
I do wonder how many of the Trump-haters even knew the story behind this, before they instinctively started popping off
As a declared "Trump-Hater" I actually agree with Prospect^. I think the POTUS orders were wrong, and ultimately are another way he is undermining American Greatness, but unfortunately he is the CIC, and the right move would have been to resign, or to at least use your chain of command. Even with an incompetant, unAmerican, Russia-loving, self-worshipping POTUS, he should not have gone against orders the way he did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty
Gallagher told his fellow in his unit soldiers that he would kill them if they told anyone about how he was shooting children.
This is the man the C-D Trump voters are celebrating.
^Yep, this is the guy Trump is trying to defend. Shameful. It's really tough to support your CIC when he's promoting stuff like this, and when (practically) the entire leadership of the military says he's undermining American interest, but again, he should have resigned. Sad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
The same people that want pedophile and murder Rodney Reed set free, want this warrior locked up for life.
America 2019
I don't know the details of the Reed case, but instead of deflecting to that, please tell us how you condone Trump wanting to pardon a true traitor who is also a murderer, and who aparently threatened his brothers in arms if they tried to uphold the law. Let's assume you are right about Reed (?), forget about that, and FOR ONCE, don't deflect. Tell us how you defend Trump and Gallagher on this one.
Military disturbed by Trump’s sporadic and reckless decision making.
The Military is disturbed by Trump’s sporadic, impulsive contradictory decision making.
Quote:
Fired Navy Secretary Richard Spencer wrote Wednesday in a Washington Post op-ed that Trump's intervention was "shocking and unprecedented. ... It was also a reminder that the president has very little understanding of what it means to be in the military, to fight ethically or to be governed by a uniform set of rules and practices."
>.........
The President's comments and his intervention -- at the urging of Fox News commentators -- reflect another worry among military leaders that Trump continues to be influenced by the network in ways that encourage him to politicize the military, an institution that is meant to stay above the political fray.
Remember when Trump said he received all his information from “the shows”, apparently the idiot still gets his information and marching orders from ‘the shows”, specifically, Fox.
But beyond that Trump is evidencing what he is. A lawless and reckless individual with no respect for laws or rules.
His Trumpist minions who routinely praise Putin’s Russia have no issue with this lawlessness because they idolize lawless regimes.
Funny how Trumpist say the military loves the military. The military now has doubts about Trump’s fitness as commander in chief.
No, "the military" isn't, just a turd that disgraced his position and the Navy over the fact that he disagreed with his superiors and refused to act in a dignified manner said that after being rightfully fired.... and had he been in the military he'd have been facing a court marshal for his actions.
Last edited by bobbythegreat; 11-28-2019 at 06:36 AM..
So, spencer went around his CoC and straight to the WH with his proposal.....not keeping his boss in the loop...
Quote:
Spencer's private proposal to the White House – which he did not share with Esper over the course of several conversations about the matter – contradicted his public position on the Gallagher case, chief Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said in a statement.[14] Esper fired Spencer on November 24, 2019, saying he was "flabbergasted" by Spencer going directly to the White House outside the chain of command.[3][13]
No, the military isn’t, although I’m sure some are upset that are in leadership. It was the Secretary of Defense that insisted on Spencer’s ouster. Spencer jumped the chain-of-command, a huge no-no.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.