Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-08-2020, 09:58 AM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,682,105 times
Reputation: 14050

Advertisements

If Bloomberg wants to "win" the ad war he'll start the commercial with Bud Light and the Hooters girls and then tell them a vote for Bloomberg buys a case of their fave booze for them......

Let's see.....if Bloomberg were to "invest" 30 billion in the campaign......and if, as a basic idea, each $200 could sway one voter sitting on the fence.......

That would be........well, too many. We have to go with $1000 a voter. So, if $1K per voter for certain populations (those who likely never see $1K, like 40% of Americans) could swing a single voter, 30B would swing 3 MILLION voters.

3 Million. I'd bet that would make a difference! Maybe he'll put it behind Andrew Yang who would then offer it to blue collar workers in the right states as the "American Dividend".

Thanks to the SCOTUS this is all possible.

Another way would be to offer Trump 10 Billion for ALL his properties and his name...which has a value closer to 3-4 Billion. Trump would be crazy not to take it. We know Trump is for sale....every businessman is. That's the whole idea.

We can get Bezos, Cook, Gates, Buffet and some others to chip in around the edges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2020, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,389,506 times
Reputation: 12655
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollsRoyce1 View Post
Doesn't that seem like a ridiculous amount of money to spend considering the fact that it's not like a 60 second commercial is going to sway anyone who isn't going to vote for Trump?

Seems like he could do something more worthwhile with the 10 million, and no I'm not like one of those people that are like "why don't these rich celebs give their money to the homeless?" I get that this money is Trump's campaign and that's what the money is for, but 10 million on a 60 second commercial seems like a waste.

Bloomberg is spending a ton of money on ads here in Michigan, even as we speak.

Apart from the fact that they are getting noticed because they are on, no one really talks about them.

In contrast, the day following the Super Bowl, talk will be about the ads that aired the day before.

Morning radio talk shows, local news and social media will all be a-buzz about the Super Bowl ads.

Putting a major campaign ad on during the Super Bowl is a ****ing brilliant strategy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top