Giving it back to Trump ... (CNN, speech, election, elect)

[cb2008]

It is the right thing to do and his actions should bear consequences. Why not? It is right for the country.

[dashrendar4454]

Originally Posted by Ringo1

I mean, it's what I would do. Didn't Trump accuse Romney of getting on his knees? Gross. Yeah, I would give that right back to him.

Alas, they don't have the guts or the spine to go against Dear Leader.

However, the american public will know the truth; as the spineless senators vote to acquit and not to hear a witness, the truth will continue to trickle out. Perhaps Parnas will release another tape.

already no one is paying attention


once the farce is behind us and the Democratic candidates now come back into focus, ouch.

[Mouser]

Originally Posted by cb2008

Don’t you think it would be sweet revenge for Romney and the rest of the Repub pols who have been insulted and called names to now hold their votes over his head?

Romney has issues with producing results...Next

As for the rest, Actions will determine their fate !

It's time some of the republicans and most of the democratic socialistic party come to
the reality that the American Tax Payer's want results, it used to be serve a term then
go home. Serving was NEVER intended to be a lifelong career.

[Mouser]

Originally Posted by Ringo1

However, the american public will know the truth; as the spineless senators vote to acquit and not to hear a witness, the truth will continue to trickle out. Perhaps Parnas will release another tape.

So why did the house not call for witness's, especially since they've been working on it
for almost three years

Install cricket sound effects here

[skeddy]

Originally Posted by Elliott_CA

Imagine how different the Senate dynamic would be if Sen. McCain was still with us.

McCain voted with Trump 83% of the time.

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by Mouser

So why did the house not call for witness's, especially since they've been working on it
for almost three years

Install cricket sound effects here

You musta been in isolation in December.

House called and received testimony from LOTS of witnesses.

Some fat orange fool blocked others from testifying, hoping he could run out the clock with court battles over subpoena powers, etc. A process that could have taken years.

House went ahead anyway. And it gave them another impeachment article.

Now, you're up to date.

Carry on.

[skeddy]

sounds like some need a bedtime story read to them

[skeddy]

Originally Posted by Mouser

So why did the house not call for witness's, especially since they've been working on it
for almost three years

Install cricket sound effects here

I always wondered why the House didn't take this impeachment stuff seriously too.

[G1..]

Originally Posted by trlhiker

It would be sweet but I doubt it would happen. Repubs are party over country.

Yup, and to the detriment of the country .

[G1..]

Originally Posted by skeddy

I always wondered why the House didn't take this impeachment stuff seriously too.

.............they did,trump ordered them not to appear. = obstruction .