Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This once again shows the brilliance of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. She has said that the focus of new laws should be on bullets, not just guns. If you don't have any bullets, the gun becomes an expensive and heavy paper-weight.
And there is no mention of or protection for bullets in the 2nd Amendment.
Bullets? They can be cast. What about the whole round? There’s a case, powder, and a primer, besides just the bullet.
Dude is reproducing semi automatics. It'll be fun to watch how our gun manufacturers and the NRA respond to this homemade gun thing when it becomes a threat to their bottom line.
It was actually a well balanced informative video.
Dude is reproducing semi automatics. It'll be fun to watch how our gun manufacturers and the NRA respond to this homemade gun thing when it becomes a threat to their bottom line.
It was actually a well balanced informative video.
The NRA works for their half million members, not the gun manufacturers. They've supported personal ammunition reloading where gun makers make most of their money for over 100 years.
Bullets? They can be cast. What about the whole round? There’s a case, powder, and a primer, besides just the bullet.
We hear about this from time to time, but I think it's a tiny, tiny percentage of people who would be willing to take the time to make their own bullets. I don't know all the technical details of 'primers' etc.
You could also pass legislation to control the equipment necessary to make bullets. It's got to be some pretty high tech stuff. Sure there will be people who will try to circumvent it, but we can keep it down to a dull roar, just as we do with the counterfeiting of money.
We hear about this from time to time, but I think it's a tiny, tiny percentage of people who would be willing to take the time to make their own bullets. I don't know all the technical details of 'primers' etc.
You could also pass legislation to control the equipment necessary to make bullets. It's got to be some pretty high tech stuff. Sure there will be people who will try to circumvent it, but we can keep it down to a dull roar, just as we do with the counterfeiting of money.
Just pointing out a lack of knowledge. I’m sure you have areas where I’d sound equally ignorant.
Casting a lead bullet is actually as low-tech as you could go.
This once again shows the brilliance of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. She has said that the focus of new laws should be on bullets, not just guns. If you don't have any bullets, the gun becomes an expensive and heavy paper-weight.
And there is no mention of or protection for bullets in the 2nd Amendment.
The underground economy will produce an acceptable alternative. Debbie Washerwoman Shultz fail.
Yes, in the United States, but that serves me right for trying to talk to the brainwashed, Communists among us.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
