Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:22 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,522,499 times
Reputation: 12310

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Things were better for black families in the 1960s (post Civil rights, of course). There were more intact families, and lots more black-owned businesses. What changed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
There is nothing stopping Black people from owning businesses today. Nothing stopping people from having children in wedlock. Starting a business and starting a family, that is within your control. This is why I disagree with the notion of "it was better in the 1960s". Blacks are the most free they have ever been since this country got started.

Everyone's out of wedlock birth rates have risen for the most part since 1970. Product of "I don't need a man" mantra. Blacks were leading the country in out of wedlock births anyway, going back to the Depression days.
Doesn't answer my question, though: why were there more black-owned businesses and intact families in the 1960s? And, by that measure, blacks WERE doing better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:22 AM
 
21,109 posts, read 13,598,599 times
Reputation: 19723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Doesn't answer my question, though: why were there more black-owned businesses and intact families in the 1960s? And, by that measure, blacks WERE doing better.
There weren't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,257 posts, read 18,628,370 times
Reputation: 25833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Doesn't answer my question, though: why were there more black-owned businesses and intact families in the 1960s? And, by that measure, blacks WERE doing better.
He knows the answer, but just doesn't want to admit it. LBJ, The Great Society and War on Poverty. Replace husbands with government checks, create generational dependency and control. What could go wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:28 AM
 
2,678 posts, read 1,704,068 times
Reputation: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by thriftylefty View Post
When folklorist and blues record promoters went to the south looking for blues music they gleaned music from; juke joints, prisons, gambling, dens, and any place were they could find the lowest character of men.
The truth is they could have gone to any middle class black family home and found the same music and a much wider range of black music. It was more marketable if it was the music of "bad men."
They went to juke joints and other places of the like because that’s where people get entertainment.

I’m absolutely certain that you don’t have to be of bad character to have went to juke joints, gamble, drink or be an alcoholic, go to night clubs etc. Prisons are different.

The entertainment industry in general of course doesn’t always have the most stellar people but I wouldn’t say it has the worse people either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:37 AM
 
2,678 posts, read 1,704,068 times
Reputation: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
There is nothing stopping Black people from owning businesses today. Nothing stopping people from having children in wedlock. Starting a business and starting a family, that is within your control. This is why I disagree with the notion of "it was better in the 1960s". Blacks are the most free they have ever been since this country got started.

Everyone's out of wedlock birth rates have risen for the most part since 1970. Product of "I don't need a man" mantra. Blacks were leading the country in out of wedlock births anyway, going back to the Depression days.
Most white people dont see it this way, at least in my opinion. I think they very hard time grasping what freedom means.

I’m also sure there are also more black entrepreneurs and black businesses than there have ever been at any time in US history. That’s also not being mentioned and I don’t always buy the “things were so much better in the old days” mantra.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:40 AM
 
2,678 posts, read 1,704,068 times
Reputation: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Doesn't answer my question, though: why were there more black-owned businesses and intact families in the 1960s? And, by that measure, blacks WERE doing better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
He knows the answer, but just doesn't want to admit it. LBJ, The Great Society and War on Poverty. Replace husbands with government checks, create generational dependency and control. What could go wrong?
Do you have any proof showing that there were more black owned businesses during the 60s?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 09:59 AM
 
7,827 posts, read 3,390,778 times
Reputation: 5141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Things were better for black families in the 1960s (post Civil rights, of course). There were more intact families, and lots more black-owned businesses. What changed?
What is your theory? Government intervention destroyed the family? This is an interesting discussion and I would honestly like to see the documentation on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 10:02 AM
 
7,827 posts, read 3,390,778 times
Reputation: 5141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Things were better for black families in the 1960s (post Civil rights, of course). There were more intact families, and lots more black-owned businesses. What changed?
What is your theory? Government intervention destroyed the family? This is an interesting discussion and I would honestly like to see the documentation on that.

Here is one set of data from 1972 to today: https://www.statista.com/statistics/...businesses-us/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 10:09 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,194 posts, read 44,953,235 times
Reputation: 13746
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastwardBound View Post
What is your theory? Government intervention destroyed the family? This is an interesting discussion and I would honestly like to see the documentation on that.

Here is one set of data from 1972 to today: https://www.statista.com/statistics/...businesses-us/
More data:
Quote:
"Data from the Small Business Administration indicates that just over 19 million businesses, or 70.9 percent of all U.S. businesses, are white-owned. Blacks own about 2.6 million businesses or 9.5 percent of all U.S. businesses, and Latinos own 3.3 million businesses or 12.2 percent of all American businesses. But the sales and employment numbers tell a more depressing story. The 19 million white-owned businesses have 88 percent of the overall sales, and control 86.5 percent of U.S. employment, while black businesses have a mere 1.3 percent of total American sales, and 1.7 percent of the nation’s employees. Latino businesses have 4 percent of U.S. sales and 4.2 percent of U.S. employment."
A lot of other interesting info, too...

Are We There Yet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2020, 10:34 AM
 
12,968 posts, read 13,701,057 times
Reputation: 9695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relaxx View Post
They went to juke joints and other places of the like because that’s where people get entertainment.

I’m absolutely certain that you don’t have to be of bad character to have went to juke joints, gamble, drink or be an alcoholic, go to night clubs etc. Prisons are different.

The entertainment industry in general of course doesn’t always have the most stellar people but I wouldn’t say it has the worse people either.
But during the same period the white artist were found on back porches and at family and community gatherings. That's why we have the Carter Family. There is already research that proved Alan Lomax, who wrote The land where the Blues Began, buried the research that showed black people and music that didn't fit his narrative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top