Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:07 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,033 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13716

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
and as they get richer and greedier...more people will be without retirement plans for a 401K match...
Your post makes no sense. Even those who don't get a matching employer contribution to their retirement accounts get richer as corporations get richer. They all own the same stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:10 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,033 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siberiaboy View Post
Because these tax increases are not going to the states and their education, Park, and other services, they are going to footing the bill for US Govt basic operations in place of red state wealthy people getting to sit pretty. It’s a tax on New Yorkers to pay for Oklahomans when New York schools can use the money. They are going to a US Treasury that is unfairly taxing them and in place of 1%ers in red states.
There's no reason local and state government services have to be so much more costly in blue states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:15 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Your post makes no sense. Even those who don't get a matching employer contribution to their retirement accounts get richer as corporations get richer. They all own the same stocks.
Elevating the stock market is not a good reason for any tax cut especially since the percentage of people that are heavily invested is small. Many living on the edge with little or know savings but a good market most definitely widens the wealth gap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:28 AM
 
Location: NY
16,083 posts, read 6,857,292 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skezo View Post
Trumps tax cuts benefited 90% of americans.
Who did they hurt? High income earners for the two big powerhouse liberal states - New York and California. This is where the big money comes from in the Democrat party. The two states also have the most Billionares in the country. The SALT deduction cap ended up given people making in the 500k+ range a substantial tax increase.

The tax bill also removed exemption from some private university. Harvard being a prime example. These universities have endowments the size of a large hedge fund that were growing at ridiculous rates and not really being used for the benefit of students or researchers. Harvards first taxable bill last year was an estimated 50 million.

Repeal the Tax cuts and these two groups are by far the biggest winners while 90% of americans are the losers.

Response:

Well done........You have done your homework...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:30 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,508,176 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
and as they get richer and greedier...more people will be without retirement plans for a 401K match...
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Your post makes no sense. Even those who don't get a matching employer contribution to their retirement accounts get richer as corporations get richer. They all own the same stocks.
Agree that it makes no sense. What that poster said is a result of the liberal belief that there is a finite “pie” - and that if wealthier people get richer, it must mean others get poorer. That is largely what is driving the hostility from liberals toward successful people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:30 AM
 
Location: NY
16,083 posts, read 6,857,292 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Benefitted 90% of people, or actually more depending on how you figure it.

While I am certainly not in the 1% by a LONG shot (actually straight middle class now that I’m retired and was perhaps in the top 10% at my peak), I actually saw my taxes go UP - but still came out ahead. That’s because his tax cuts included bringing corporations down to a globally competitive level, and my retirement account skyrocketed as a result.

Thus, should Biden reverse the tax cuts and bring corporations up to 28%, as he has threatened to do, I will pay $2000 more in taxes but lose 25x that in investment value. (And again, I’m far from rich.....just a person who earned a decent, although not an extraordinary, income and saved for her retirement for 40 years).

If Biden wins and reverses the tax cuts, 90% of people will see their taxes increase and more than half of Americans (the tax-paying half) will see their retirement accounts plummet.


Response:

I am so happy to hear from realists......Great job!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:35 AM
 
Location: NY
16,083 posts, read 6,857,292 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
You benefitted from a bubble created because there is no place for your retirement funds to go to.
It will show up that Corp. earnings do not match up with the PE ratio.
Your growth is for the most part unrealized.
We have seen this bubble go down once.
I suggest you take some profit.

You also tell the truth that you did not see a tax cut. Those who will see the tax increase will be the 1%.
The line from Trump and the GOP was that we would see pay rates increase, that only happened for those whose earning's were based on stock prices.

When Biden win's the issue with the Fed and the current stimulus will still be there. As long as the Govt. continues to suck up all the credit we will have growth problems.
Excerpt: I suggest you take some profit.

Response:
...........and do what? roll it over, purchase some property, how about a couple of paintings, maybe gold or silver?
The name of the game is manipulation. Convince the masses in doing one thing while the unscrupulous swoop in from behind.

No thanks. Staying put..............our Country will do just fine..............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:42 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,218,912 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Excerpt: I suggest you take some profit.

Response:
...........and do what? roll it over, purchase some property, how about a couple of paintings, maybe gold or silver?
The name of the game is manipulation. Convince the masses in doing one thing while the unscrupulous swoop in from behind.

No thanks. Staying put..............until I'm 6 ft under......then no longer my problem.
Enjoy, I hope your family has the opportunity to enjoy the wealth you have accumulated. Of course if we get another 2008-09, it will be a lot smaller.

Taking some profit at the time of record prices is the way to blunt the bubble effect. Thereby protecting your families future wealth.

When the bubble breaks the 20% drop will be huge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:44 AM
 
Location: NY
16,083 posts, read 6,857,292 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
All true! Especially the part I bolded. I have to wonder why so many dumbf**ks kept whining "They're tax cuts for the rich! Tax cuts for the rich!" when the exact opposite was actually true.

I gave this example a few months ago to try to make people understand what really happened, but most are too stupid to get it:

Here's what happened with Trump's 2017 tax cut:


Wealthy Taxpayers Screaming About Lost Deductions Under Trump Tax "Cuts"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleae.../#430afdd2a9c0

See what happened there?

The SALT tax deduction she took on her US 1040 for...

2017: $245,500
2018: just $10,000


The $235,500 over $10,000 she could no longer deduct in 2018 and going forward was taxed at her marginal rate, likely at 37% which would be an extra $87,135 in federal income tax. That's NOT a tax cut; it's a tax INCREASE on the rich.

To further illustrate the point, examples:

$150,000 household pays $15,000 in SALT.
Deduct $10,000. Taxed on that extra $5,000 at 22% marginal tax rate = $1,100

$1.5 million household pays $150,000 in SALT.
Deduct $10,000. Taxed on that extra $140,000 at 37% marginal tax rate = $51,800

There's a 10 times difference in household income and SALT between the two households, but the top 1%-er is paying about 50 times more in extra tax than the middle class household due to the new SALT deduction limit.

Understand? But Biden wants to repeal the $10,000 SALT deduction cap and reinstate the formerly unlimited deduction.

Why, Dems? Why?!?
Response:
Nice work...........I was fortunate that President Donald Trump's Tax Cuts worked out for me especially
being retired and on a fixed income. President Trump realizes half the nation is getting old and he needs to
take care of the folks that worked and contributed to this great Country. Now it's time for the young and wealthy
to step up to the plate and do their part by paying their portion of taxes.................as we once did when we were younger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 05:45 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,033 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Elevating the stock market is not a good reason for any tax cut especially since the percentage of people that are heavily invested is small. Many living on the edge with little or know savings but a good market most definitely widens the wealth gap.
Who said elevating the stock market was the reason for the tax cut? I'm responding to people complaining about stock buybacks making the rich even richer. I simply pointed out the buybacks make EVERY stockholder richer, including the tens of millions (if not more) who have a pension and/or retirement account. They all own the same stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top