Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,892 posts, read 30,269,602 times
Reputation: 19097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
These two have a long history of fighting with everyone in their neighborhood, to family to municipalities.

They are nut jobs -- rich -- but nutty.
Hah, so you know them personally?

I saw the video....the first one that came out, which showed the gate all broken and the idiots yelling profanities at them....threatening them, so...doesn't matter what you think of them they had every right to do what they did, and I'd have done the very same.

This community was off the street, and gated, with signs...so, regardless of what anyone thinks of them, they were in the right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,174 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14898
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
There is no such thing as "full semi auto" ....
I'm aware. I was a gunsmith for four years. Tell that to the guy whose post I answered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,174 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14898
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
It’s not a big deal, but the M16 existed, and entered US military service, prior to 1967.

The civilian AR15 is not capable of full auto. “Full semi auto” isn’t a thing. It’s nonsensical.
Go tell 1angrytaxpayer. He's the one who coined the term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,347,290 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
Hah, so you know them personally?

I saw the video....the first one that came out, which showed the gate all broken and the idiots yelling profanities at them....threatening them, so...doesn't matter what you think of them they had every right to do what they did, and I'd have done the very same.

This community was off the street, and gated, with signs...so, regardless of what anyone thinks of them, they were in the right.
Sorry the first video out does not show the gate broken. It is intact and a guy is holding it open for the protesters to enter. And there is, at that point, no one engaging with McCloskey when he first appears with the gun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:27 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,094,094 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
According to Bent Bow in Missouri you can shoot a person for trespassing. Still waiting for him to produce that info.

Yes the neighbors who spoke against their actions is telling. To claim there were others in support of the couple but stayed quiet out of fear of another crowd of protesters is nothing more than speculation and IMO a reach. They are not liked, they have behaved this way before, and it's disappointing that so many are defending these A-holes.
Here is what I found:


If someone is breaking into your home and you must use deadly force, there will be a presumption in Missouri that your actions were justified. You’re no longer protecting just your property; you’re now protecting yourself or your family. A mere trespasser can quickly become a more dangerous threat, so it’s crucial you understand the laws in your state.
https://www.uslawshield.com/unwanted-guests-missouri/


The key phrase here is "If someone is breaking into your home". Nothing about being legally justified in shooting someone just for trespassing on your property, or being in your front yard, or even on your porch or stoop. But only if someone is in the process of forcibly breaking into your home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,100,379 times
Reputation: 11535
I can 100% guarantee that they are already fixing to sue the City, County, and DA. Think MM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:44 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,263 posts, read 52,668,250 times
Reputation: 52774
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
I can 100% guarantee that they are already fixing to sue the City, County, and DA. Think MM
So many on this thread seem to be experts on several aspects of law, but I'll humbly admit I'm not sure what the legalities are of this whole case. I support these people but I also wonder if waving the guns around was the right thing to do. I also wasn't there and sometimes video "evidence" can be misleading and or not tell the whole picture. Some say that they should have just stayed indoors, maybe, I don't know, but what if they did start or attempt to cause property destruction , I don't think that there are always 100% clear ways to go here. Part me of thinks that them coming out heavy with the arms might have been a good thing to ensure that they kept it moving and didn't cause any destruction. I generally lean toward the less violent or confrontational approach. That said after seeing parts of their city go up in flames just days before I can see them being a bit jumpy when all of the sudden you've got 100 plus people traipsing across your property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:45 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,924,139 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by r small View Post
Private property or not if that couple had shot someone outside of the four walls of their house, and without a strong case for self-defense, they would be in serious trouble. If they were concerned for their personal safety they should have stayed inside the house with the doors locked. Then if there were a forced entry they would have been justified in shooting. But brandishing a firearm while people are walking past your house is (or should be) a chargeable offense. The gal definitely could be charged with brandishing the way she was waving her little .380 around.
Besides attempting to try their case in the media, their defense strategy appears to be as if in anticipation of criminal charges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Arizona
7,511 posts, read 4,352,988 times
Reputation: 6164
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionking View Post
Just got to make a list of recent events and add them up to see a pattern.

1 Leftist politician orders confiscation of guns from people who were defending themselves from protesters (rioters) , the left say they the protesters were peaceful, plenty of news reports say otherwise.

2 If BLM is painted on your street or other places in a leftist area the politicians call it a "mural" but if someone tries to paint over it to restore the street or building to normal the left will arrest you with a "hate crime".

3 leftist politicians encourage and support protesters (rioters) taking over parts of a city like Seattle (armed with weapons just like the Missouri man was) and call it a "summer of love", while calling for defunding of police and bans on guns in general.

4 What started out as a protest against police misuse of force (which most people are against) has turned into dredging up the past acting like the U.S.A still has slavery and Jim Crow laws and the media reports everything they can about a "white person did this, a white person did that", statutes being torn down, calls to dismantle the U.S.A economic and political system, certain celebrities saying celebrating the 4th of July is celebrating "white supremacy" and how supposedly the U.S.A is just awash in racist white people everywhere who are "privileged".

5 Certain cities and colleges pushing forth mandatory courses that only white people are to take to enlighten them on how they are racist and how to acknowledge it and make amends for it.


6 Said leftist politicians and activists who often openly call themselves socialist if not Marxist attempting to end the electoral college, stack the supreme court, add senators based on population and make the district of Colombia a 51st state, all of which would solidify permanent majority control for them. One has to wonder what they would do with the constitution if having complete dominant control like that.

7 leftist politicians and activists calling for harassing people at their home, or out in public, and using social media to inform other leftists about who says something against them so other activists can go after them either personally or scare their employment into firing them.

One only look back in history , history so many times to see how this potentially plays out, in Nazi Germany painting a Swastika was considered a mural, painting over it a crime against the state, the "privileged" Jews got to wear stars , later we know what came next.

In Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela and other countries that had a cultural communist revolution, privileged people or others deemed against the revolution or individual thought like teachers, philosophers and intellects were rounded up and either relocated or put in a trench, and all their assets confiscated.

And in the end, the leaders and people in the top tier of said political control or loyalists lived true lives of "privilege" in Nazi Germany or communist USSR while everyone else suffered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2020, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Arizona
7,511 posts, read 4,352,988 times
Reputation: 6164
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
Nothing you have posted discredits what I have posted. Again they didn't stop at the home owners house and banged drums and shouted threats to those homeowners. They also did not break down the gate upon entry as was claimed. There is absolutely no reason to believe the home owners saw them break down the gate as it didn't happen upon entry. Why wouldn't the protesters leave the same way they entered? Why would they go out another route?

As you have acknowledged the home owners over reacted by threatening the protesters with guns.
As if you were actually there? If so then you should be testifying as a material witness. Has the DA called you yet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top