Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-24-2020, 11:56 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,398,118 times
Reputation: 10467

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
these protesters were not walking by...
In fact they were, and the vast majority of them didn't stop to engage the McCloskeys, even after they confronted them.

Funny the protesters seemed to just walk on past - and not engage/harass/damage/etc - scores of other homes on their 1+ mile march to the Mayor's house. I wonder why the McCloskey's house was different?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
...and they by law they shouldn't have been there...
Agreed, 100%.


Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
...they swore at the McCloskeys and threatened them and their dog.
Before or after Mrs. McCloskey pointed a firearm at them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2020, 11:57 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,398,118 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by tipsyguam View Post
I have the right to defend myself and my property if I feel threatened will trump whatever you are referring to.
"Whatever I'm referring to"? I'm referring to the laws surrounding pointing a firearm at someone in your state. What are they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 11:59 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,398,118 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
They are charged with violating a Missouri law about threatening people with guns.

At the trial, they can present evidence that they were threatened, were in fear for their lives, etc.

That's how our justice system works.

Surprising that so many on this thread are unaware of this.
Right? Couldn't rep you again.

If a jury says their actions were reasonable, after hearing all the evidence, I'm 100% OK with that outcome.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,121 posts, read 41,309,818 times
Reputation: 45197
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
I wonder why the McCloskey's house was different?

It was the first house the "protesters" passed after coming through the gate.

Please explain how the McCloskeys could know that they would be "peaceful" and there was no risk to themselves and their home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 12:38 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,398,118 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
It was the first house the "protesters" passed after coming through the gate.

Please explain how the McCloskeys could know that they would be "peaceful" and there was no risk to themselves and their home.

It wasn't the first house the protesters passed, though. Just the first one on Portland Place.

Again, why was their house different?

Explain how the McCloskeys could know that they weren't peaceful?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,121 posts, read 41,309,818 times
Reputation: 45197
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
It wasn't the first house the protesters passed, though. Just the first one on Portland Place.

Again, why was their house different?

Explain how the McCloskeys could know that they weren't peaceful?
I said, "It was the first house the "protesters" passed after coming through the gate."

They could not know whether they would be peaceful or not. That is the point. Assuming that they would be peaceful could have been a disaster if some in the group planned to be violent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 12:51 PM
 
11,185 posts, read 6,514,129 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussiehoff View Post
It's not a comment on the legal system, just political support for a political action.
A few of Fair and Just Prosecution Voices of Change --- Kim Gardner, Kim Foxx [Chicago], Marilyn Mosby [Chicago]:

https://fairandjustprosecution.org/n...ces-of-change/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Cali
14,232 posts, read 4,601,138 times
Reputation: 8321
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
They are charged with violating a Missouri law about threatening people with guns.

At the trial, they can present evidence that they were threatened, were in fear for their lives, etc.

That's how our justice system works.

Surprising that so many on this thread are unaware of this.
all the McCloskeys have to say is the were in fear of imminent danger to their lives and their properties. That's it. They don't have to provide "evidence" for fear because fear is not tangible object that you can physically touch or present as evidence (i.e. a gun or a knife)


What you are referring to is "circumstantial evidence". Circumstantial evidences that they will use are:


1) weeks of violent protest in St Louis where one retired St Louis police captain was shot dead by the mob
2) mccloskeys home is in a private community
3) the mayor's home is not in the same block as the Mccloskeys
4)mccloskeys home was the first home on the block where the mob entered


In any use of force, the defendant does not have to be right, but they have to be reasonable using a reasonable person standard in the same circumstances without benefit of 20/20 hindsight
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 01:52 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,142,200 times
Reputation: 13096
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490 View Post
There has to be a reasonable perceived threat of bodily harm can't shoot someone for trespassing. You probably can get away with pointing a gun at them as we seen with this case can be charged. If your well connected have deep pockets nothing will happen, but working class guy could end differently. Different in every state why good idea to know your laws, and always take the most Conservative route. If you see someone breaking into a parked car call the police don't go running out there with your AR-15 any number of bad outcomes could end up from that.
The courts have ruled "you can use deadly force if YOU deem it necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2020, 01:55 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,142,200 times
Reputation: 13096
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
It wasn't the first house the protesters passed, though. Just the first one on Portland Place.

Again, why was their house different?

Explain how the McCloskeys could know that they weren't peaceful?
They broke a gate and entered private property illegally. The land was posted. Thar makes it a crime to enter. In Missouri, a purple post or tree is a sign of private property. It is well known that is what it means under the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top