Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Listen to the chief copsplain.
"If he would have just submitted to our tyrannical ways"
Can you say huge payday for a jog.
I guess liberals typically have boiling blood, while humans are at 37 Celsius.
Looks like that is a new diagnostic tool to differentiate liberals from humans, instead of just looking for those with their hands out, wearing masks, and behind bars.
How about an officer go to the woman with a phone or tablet to video call and determine if he’s the suspect or not that way? Maybe she already had a phone to do such a thing?
Listen to the chief copsplain.
"If he would have just submitted to our tyrannical ways"
Can you say huge payday for a jog.
Once again, you've proudly put your profound ignorance on display for everyone to enjoy. Please muster the sum total of your meager brain power to assimilate the following:
1) The jogger matched the description of a violent crime suspect.
2) The police did precisely what any rational citizen would expect them to do. They did what we pay them to do
3) The jogger, who, like you, doesn't understand the concept of reasonable suspicion, resisted arrest
4) As expected, it did not end well for said idiot.
Please explain the problem. You do not understand the law. Being the nice guy than I am, I offer you this advice: **** about things you don't understand. Educate yourself.
Last edited by YourWakeUpCall; 08-31-2020 at 07:14 PM..
You side with a bunch of police bootlickers, and you expect them to be mad about this? Your Conservative friends don't care about constitutional rights so expecting then to be outraged over that violation is pointless.
I'm glad they ended up catching the right guy and I can easily understand the gentleman in the green shirt not trusting the police in this situation. I say that as someone who leans towards giving police the benefit of the doubt. Not condemning their actions but I sympathize with the man who was initially stopped. He screwed up by fighting and kicking the officers. Noted that the actual suspect does not resemble the first guy.
Not imo!
If I was detained or arrested like this, I would be fighting and kicking too!
Once again, you've proudly put your profound ignorance on display for everyone to enjoy. Please muster the sum total of your meager brain power to assimilate the following:
1) The jogger matched the description of a violent crime suspect.
2) The police did precisely what any rational citizen would expect them to do. They did what we pay them to do
3) The jogger, who, like you, doesn't understand the concept of reasonable suspicion, resisted arrest
4) As expected, it did not end well for said idiot.
Please explain the problem. You do not understand the law. Being the nice guy than I am, I offer you this advice: **** about things you don't understand. Educate yourself.
To be fair, the suspect did NOT look anything like the person described by the so called victim. The woman that called to report the black man could not come to identify the suspect because she had two small children. She should have had someone (a female cop) take care of her kids and forced to come to the place where jogger was being detained to identify said person or provided a photo.
Hillary was right, all black people look alike.../sarcasm.
Now for someone who isn't a complete ideological militant on either side:
this is a complicated situation. The victim is not at the scene. The police are acting on a description that they feel has been met of someone who has allegedly committed a very serious crime. The black dude is not the right person, so he has reason to be upset or concerned about police wanting to arrest him for something HE knows he didn't do, but which THEY don't know he didn't do. Is he obligated to allow them to detain him? I think these are the kinds of things that should be more clearly defined by the law, not by people with chips on their shoulder about authority because of some deep seeded issues.
To be fair, the suspect did NOT look anything like the person described by the so called victim. The woman that called to report the black man could not come to identify the suspect because she had two small children. She should have had someone (a female cop) take care of her kids and forced to come to the place where jogger was being detained to identify said person.
Hillary was right, all black people look alike.../sarcasm.
Unless he shaved his beard before his mug shot was taken, yeah, that's pretty far off base.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
