Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Cheektowaga, NY
2,008 posts, read 1,250,922 times
Reputation: 1794

Advertisements

rEsIsT!!!!!!!!

 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,749,959 times
Reputation: 6594
Still waiting on the rape allegations. I expect somebody will come forward insisting that she tortured puppies as a hobby when they were kids together.

If the Republicans fail to replace RGB this year, Republican voters will punish every Republican senator responsible. They will be replaced in the primaries, every single one of them.
 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:46 PM
 
16,647 posts, read 8,663,915 times
Reputation: 19476
[quote=jojajn;59210621]So much for trump nominating Constitutional judges.



[url="https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/ [/QUOTE]


Oh, here we go with another leftist zealot trying to attack Trump and anything connected with him, so you are linking another left wing propaganda site.


`
 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
25,887 posts, read 12,926,296 times
Reputation: 19427
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrowGirl View Post
In legal jargon the order of precedence means which document has greater weight. So if there are conflicts between the two documents, then the document with precedence controls the question.

However that isn't really the issue since she didn't actually use that word, at least from what the article says - it's just how the article describes it. However, if she views the Bible as being the controlling document to her legal decisions rather than the Constitution, that's a problem. Not because I am opposed to the Bible, but the job of Supreme Court justice is to support and interpret the Constitution, not the Bible or any other religious text.
I have read her words from her last confirmation, and the Bible does not drive her decisions. She was quite clear on this.
 
Old 09-20-2020, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,402,773 times
Reputation: 14459
Meh, both are pretty useless to those who abide by natural law.

Commence with the bickering.
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:06 PM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 19 days ago)
 
35,670 posts, read 18,045,481 times
Reputation: 50725
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Well, we knew the attacks would be coming, guess this is the best you guys could come up with.

At least you aren't inventing rape allegations this time.
You can't be serious. For a supreme court nominee, that is EXTREMELY troubling.

MUCH more troubling than fraternity boy naughty hijinks allegations, by far.

This is an issue that would make her absolutely unfit to serve as a Supreme Court Justice, if she values the teachings of the Bible over the US Constitution, that would be her job to interpret.
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
16,960 posts, read 17,371,830 times
Reputation: 30258
Prefect pick for liberals.
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:21 PM
 
13,652 posts, read 4,962,881 times
Reputation: 9736
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrowGirl View Post
In legal jargon the order of precedence means which document has greater weight. So if there are conflicts between the two documents, then the document with precedence controls the question.

However that isn't really the issue since she didn't actually use that word, at least from what the article says - it's just how the article describes it. However, if she views the Bible as being the controlling document to her legal decisions rather than the Constitution, that's a problem. Not because I am opposed to the Bible, but the job of Supreme Court justice is to support and interpret the Constitution, not the Bible or any other religious text.
Thank you for clarifying the meaning of "precedes" in this context. I also agree with your last sentence.

For example, in the article she stated that abortion is always immoral. She certainly has a right to this opinion. However, the morality of abortion ought to be irrelevant to its legality. If she finds that the Constitution does not protect the right to abortion in any way, then she is free to vote to overturn Roe v Wade. But not for the reason that she or the Church find it immoral.
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:27 PM
 
3,812 posts, read 4,704,027 times
Reputation: 3330
I'm just wondering how many men she sexually assaulted in her college years. That's what I wanna know!
 
Old 09-20-2020, 07:29 PM
 
6,675 posts, read 4,289,393 times
Reputation: 8441
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
So much for trump nominating Constitutional judges.



Leading SCOTUS Candidate Amy Coney Barrett Claims Bible Precedes Constitution
Figures the desperate left trots this out. Very predictable. I’m sure racist is next.

Get ready for democratic sky screaming.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top