Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What concerns me why bipartisan poll watchers were refused access to and/or kicked out of polling sites solely in heavily democratic counties in swing states. Why? There’s video of it happening therefore it can’t be denied. There also video of them covering up their windows in order to block any view inside. Why would you do this unless you’re doing something that you don’t want anyone else to see?
Let's see you post more evidence of your claims so we can educate you. Hint: Trumpers trying to show up and intimidate voters at Donald's request don't count as "bipartisan poll watchers." The window thing was already explained as blocking zealous citizens from filming and photographing poll workers, which you're not allowed to do and doesn't constitute "poll watching."
When you peel it back, every conservative claim of "fraud" thus far turns out to be misconstrued bullsuit with an eye to engineer a result for Trump.
So all the repub leaders who have clearly stated there is no voter fraud are in cahoots with the dems?
Also, the hoped for blue tsunami didn’t materialize. Does anyone really think if the dems had the means to cheat, they would have done so with a razor -thin margin??
So all the repub leaders who have clearly stated there is no voter fraud are in cahoots with the dems?
Also, the hoped for blue tsunami didn’t materialize. Does anyone really think if the dems had the means to cheat, they would have done so with a razor -thin margin??
Couple things here....
1. Yes, they are all members of the deep state (and likely pedophiles)
2. Don’t you know that when you cheat on a test, you have to miss a few questions so that nobody will know that you cheated.
The good news is the GOP retained the Senate, picked up a good number of House seats, and didn't lose a single state legislature (important for redistricting in a census year).
If Biden and the Democrats manage to steal this, it's fine. That guarantees the GOP takes over the House of Representatives in 2022, there is no mandate for a Biden presidency, his executive orders will be overturned by a conservative SCOTUS, and Biden will easily lose to Trump in 2024.
All in all this was a great election for conservatives, notwithstanding the Democrats' cheating. Even that has a silver lining because any objective observer can see that the Democrats are cheating and lying to win. As always.
Why do conservatives keep trying to disenfranchise scores of legally cast ballots?
Look, I get that you wish mail-in ballots were illegal, but they're not. They've been perfectly legal for many election cycles, including in 2016 when a quarter of all ballots cast were mail-in - and no one complained because Trump won (funny how that works).
I get that you also want to pin the narrative that mail-in ballots are all fraudulent, but repeated studies over time have shown they are not. And all the claims you make of fraud have never been backed up. This forum is rife with misconstrued nonsense from Twitter feeds, several of which I've debunked with evidence in the past hour alone.
So there isn't evidence of "ballot stuffing" as claimed - but what there is evidence of is Donald and his fans trying to throw out tens of thousands of mail-in ballots, because they know those tend to skew towards Biden. We know this because Donald has point-blank said we should stop counting them.
Count. Every. Vote. If it was legally cast, then count it, whether on or after election day. It's that simple - unless you're trying to rig an election.
There are bipartisan people at every polling place and there isn't one single verified case of that not being adhered to. You will believe anything this grifter tells you.
Wisconsin
Total number of registered voters: 3,129,000. Total number of votes cast: 3,239,920
but
According to the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the state had 3,684,726 active registered voters as of Nov. 1. As of Wednesday afternoon, there had been nearly 3.3 million ballots counted in the presidential race, according to The Associated Press.
How many registered right before the election? That would explain the difference. Someone said 400,000 but wouldn't that be easily verified?
The problem is allowing people to vote who don't have a voter ID showing proof they live in that area much less who they are.
There have been many studies done by various groups over the years, and not one has found any evidence of widespread voter fraud.
What we do have evidence of, though, is conservatives peddling misconstrued and misrepresented bull**** rumors of fraud to support a narrative that the election should be handed over to their guy. They don't have evidence, but as good students of Trump, they know they don't need evidence; just perpetrate the perception and the job is half done.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why do conservatives keep trying to disenfranchise scores of legally cast ballots?
