Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Does she think there's a Twitter judge who's gonna award her client something? This is embarrassing. If there's evidence, present it in court. They've only lost 32 or 33 times so far.
I read what Wood took to court. It was embarrassing. The judge said they had eight months to do something and they waited until two weeks after the election.
Wrong. She said "it was understandable" why her table was told they could not eat or drink. But the other table was allowed to eat and drink. You forget to mention that she said that table was unusual because they were not counting as a team,.....
"We were explicitly told we could not have drinks or food of any kind on the table-that was understandable. the people behind us and in front of us however had open water bottles, breakfast burritos supplied by BOE, and snacks at their table. Also, those tables were not counting as a team, with a pass off from one to the other"
sounds like she's pissed about the burritos and it's completely independent of the team counting.
i read the entire affidavit, she thinks it was disorganized, wasn't the way she's used to doing it, she believes some ballots were marked similar and the cool kids got to have breakfast burritos... nothing rising to evidence of fraud. a trump-appointed judge agrees. the case was rejected.
Unfortunately, it has been a problem in the past. The lawyer laid that out.
I had also heard of issues with it from other sources previously.
Has any issue in the past been prevalent enough to change the results of an election? Why weren't we looking at this system in the early 2000s when it came out? In the 2010s? 2016? Why is it all of a sudden such a problem?
Never saw anything like that press conference in our history, an embarrassing moment. One hour and forty five minutes of conjecture and absolutely no proof. Somehow he worked Chavez, Maduro and Venezuela into the conspiracy but he left out China and Cuba.
Yeah but Rudy G said he didn't "know whether they would have enough time" (1:05:20 - 1:05:35) to develop that so-called evidence for the Courts along with how U.S. elections supposedly are processed outside the country on servers using Venezuelan-developed software. That the Democrats cheated with the machines. It is pesky is it not that Courts tend to want developed evidence submitted in writing? Sounds like Kraken's encountered choppy waters.
Rudy G is going to keep investigating the travesty. Apparently the FBI is doing squat. Missing in action says Rudy G.
Even without the Kraken, Rudy G. remains confident he can win with the The Affidavits. Those paired with how the data look. When a reporter asked where to access those over vote data, Rudy G. and Sidney Powell suggested news organizations use public figures to calculate it for themselves.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
