Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not all Indian tribes warred with each other. Most didn't, in fact. Furthermore, according to your reasoning not only should all white people go back to Europe (after all we invaded someone else's tribal space), or at least settling the New World was a mistake, but also, each European tribe should remain separate. My mother is from Germany and my father's side of the family is all from the UK. Those are separate European tribes. So that shouldn't have happened! Same, undoubtedly, for you. 95%+ of all Americans are the result of interbreeding among different tribes, even ignoring different races.
Not all Indian tribes warred with each other. Most didn't, in fact. Furthermore, according to your reasoning not only should all white people go back to Europe (after all we invaded someone else's tribal space), or at least settling the New World was a mistake, but also, each European tribe should remain separate. My mother is from Germany and my father's side of the family is all from the UK. Those are separate European tribes. So that shouldn't have happened! Same, undoubtedly, for you. 95%+ of all Americans are the result of interbreeding among different tribes, even ignoring different races.
But left to their own device the Indians formed 100s of separate, independent tribal nations. Of course on a case by case basis and over time people of different tribes and ethnicity that especially aren't too distant can get along and find compatibility. All the native tribes within the UK and the nearby nations aren't so fundamentally different. But just force cramming masses of very different people together is a different matter.
But left to their own device the Indians formed 100s of separate, independent tribal nations.
OK then, let's divide the US and Europe up into 100's of separate, independent tribal nations.
Quote:
Of course on a case by case basis and over time people of different tribes and ethnicity that especially aren't too distant can get along and find compatibility. All the native tribes within the UK and the nearby nations aren't so fundamentally different. But just force cramming masses of very different people together is a different matter.
It used to be that the English, the French and the Germans (or Prussians) were constantly at each other's throats. Now they aren't. If they can eventually get along, so can anybody else.
OK then, let's divide the US and Europe up into 100's of separate, independent tribal nations.
It used to be that the English, the French and the Germans (or Prussians) were constantly at each other's throats. Now they aren't. If they can eventually get along, so can anybody else.
Well we don't have to go crazy. The British, French and Germans weren't usually fighting out of ethnic hostility or cultural differences but usually more imperial motivations. What I'm suggesting is keep migration how it was up through the 1960s instead of instituting mass, global immigration that we've had for over 50 years now.
The big issue is that you believe your religion should rule society and that anyone who doesn't follow your religion to your extremely strict, rigorous standard should be eliminated from society. To deny your religion anything less than 100% rule with an iron fist is persecution. Since LGBTQ people in particular are so at odds with your religion, they are first to be exterminated but the thing about fundamentalism and purity tests is there will always be a new "out group" who doesn't meet the standard.
You are right, there can be no compromises with people like you who demand uncompromising obedience. You are the reason there can be no compromises because you refuse to accept that a society can exist without everyone being forced at the end of a barrel of a gun to follow your Bible your way.
But left to their own device the Indians formed 100s of separate, independent tribal nations. Of course on a case by case basis and over time people of different tribes and ethnicity that especially aren't too distant can get along and find compatibility. All the native tribes within the UK and the nearby nations aren't so fundamentally different. But just force cramming masses of very different people together is a different matter.
Like putting a pit bull in the chicken yard and thinking they will all get along fine.
If you don't see the increasingly aggressive promotion of pseudo-diversity all around you, you must be living under a very isolated rock in the Mohave Desert.
Indeed so. Recently I posted an article from the Baltimore Sun complaining that one of the suburban school systems was "too white." Yes, that's right: "too white."
The diversity mongers are not happy if a place is too white. Now, if it's too black, or too Asian, or too Hispanic, all that is just fine and dandy. But if too many white people dare to congregate somewhere, it's a problem and they must be shamed.
I'd like to see these people who fetishize diversity to try to increase the white population of Kinshasa or the Asian population of Mexico City or the Hispanic population of Tokyo. After all, it must be bad, that those places aren't as racially diverse as they want America to be. Right? Or is it only majority-white places that are bad and must be diversified?
Indeed so. Recently I posted an article from the Baltimore Sun complaining that one of the suburban school systems was "too white." Yes, that's right: "too white."
The diversity mongers are not happy if a place is too white. Now, if it's too black, or too Asian, or too Hispanic, all that is just fine and dandy. But if too many white people dare to congregate somewhere, it's a problem and they must be shamed.
I'd like to see these people who fetishize diversity to try to increase the white population of Kinshasa or the Asian population of Mexico City or the Hispanic population of Tokyo. After all, it must be bad, that those places aren't as racially diverse as they want America to be. Right? Or is it only majority-white places that are bad and must be diversified?
Basically they have redefined diversity to be all about minority skin color.
These woke people are butchering the fabric of society.
I agree that since it is globalists that are pushing for diversity they and all their money and influence should be pushing it worldwide.
Latin America needs 100’s of millions of Africans, Asians and Middle Easterners.
Africa needs the same amounts of Asians and to a lesser extent Europeans and mixed race Latin Americans.
Asia needs tons of Africans, Latin Americans and Europeans.
I guess the West being the home base and power source of the globalists is why it is much easier for them to make it happen here faster. But it should not happen here unless it is happening around the world in equal measure. Something tells me war would be the result if they pushed that policy.
It’s funny how globalists and democrats talk about mass immigration being the soul of our country, yet they wish to erase our borders, which without with a country does not exist.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Same, undoubtedly, for you. 95%+ of all Americans are the result of interbreeding among different tribes, even ignoring different races.
