Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
117 Texas hospital employees suing over the vaccine mandate. Will be interesting to see how this turns out. Their attorney is also citing the Nuremberg Code.
Texas Hospital Sued by 117 Employees For Requiring COVID Vaccine to Work
A Texas hospital is being sued by a group of more than 100 medical workers who allege that a requirement they receive COVID-19 vaccines forces them "to be human guinea pigs."
"For the first time in the history of the United States, an employer is forcing an employee to participate in an experimental vaccine trial as a condition for continued employment," the lawsuit reportedly states.
Many people are rightfully more concerned about the potential harm from the "vaccine" than they are from the virus. The inoculation is highly experimental, it is based on technology which has virtually no successful track record, and the list of problems that people have experienced after taking it is substantial and growing daily.
If the employee is being forced to accept the employer's assessment that the employee is "helped" by this inoculation under threat of termination, that is coercion.
It is also unethical in this situation, as the assertions by the employee's attorney that this is in violation of the Nuremberg code indicates. This really is getting very far out of hand.
The list of problems for which there is as yet no evidence confirming that the vaccines are causative.
The mRNA vaccines have succeeded well beyond the expectations of the experts.
There would be a violation of the Nuremberg Code only if the employee could not refuse the vaccine for any reason. The employee may refuse the vaccine and find another job.
Many people are rightfully more concerned about the potential harm from the "vaccine" than they are from the virus. The inoculation is highly experimental, it is based on technology which has virtually no successful track record, and the list of problems that people have experienced after taking it is substantial and growing daily.
If the employee is being forced to accept the employer's assessment that the employee is "helped" by this inoculation under threat of termination, that is coercion.
It is also unethical in this situation, as the assertions by the employee's attorney that this is in violation of the Nuremberg code indicates. This really is getting very far out of hand.
Your post is loaded with misinformation and outright lies.
How are you being coerced by your employer, especially in the field of medicine where as vaccine protects both the employee and their patients?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree
Look up the term 'coercion'. And you can be coerced into doing something good for you, as well as bad for you.
Employee --- employer ---- vaccine --- medical field --- policy guidelines; know you're rights as an employee. Employee can opt out, but employer AT-Will can let you go. Employee can try and take it to the federal courts and I wish them the best of luck with it.
How are you being coerced by your employer, especially in the field of medicine where as vaccine protects both the employee and their patients?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713
Many people are rightfully more concerned about the potential harm from the "vaccine" than they are from the virus. The inoculation is highly experimental, it is based on technology which has virtually no successful track record, and the list of problems that people have experienced after taking it is substantial and growing daily.
If the employee is being forced to accept the employer's assessment that the employee is "helped" by this inoculation under threat of termination, that is coercion.
It is also unethical in this situation, as the assertions by the employee's attorney that this is in violation of the Nuremberg code indicates. This really is getting very far out of hand.
The Nuremberg Code is not federal law, it is a basis for ethical practices in medicine. The employee in the field of medicine is not the subject of an experiment
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713
If the employee is being forced to accept the employer's assessment that the employee is "helped" by this inoculation under threat of termination, that is coercion.
If a person does not know their rights as an employee in the medical field, then they shouldn't be in that field.
I was given vaccines as a food service worker at a hospital --- if I was still there today, I would be given the vaccine or I would opt out and go home, look for me another job. I can disagree with their policy, but I can't continue to work there and make up my own rules for employment.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
