Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2021, 08:29 AM
 
13,601 posts, read 4,934,489 times
Reputation: 9687

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Correct. Fully 15% of Biden voters said they would not have voted for him had they known of the Hunter story - and Trump would have won. CNN and the other MSM of course anticipated that, which is why they hid it.
.
You mean that if MSM had published fake stories about Hunter Biden, then Joe would have lost? Well, that's scary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2021, 08:47 AM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,832,803 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
It appears we'll never know if there was a "Big Lie" or a "Big Truth". We spent 3 years and $40 million to determine that there was no Russian Collusion.
What planet do you live on?

This, from your Republican lead Senate Investigation.

"Beginning while he was Campaign chairman and continuing until at least until 2018, Manafort discussed with Kilimnik a peace plan for eastern Ukraine that benefited the Kremlin. After the election, Manafort continued to coordinate with Russian persons, particularly Kilimnik and other individuals close to Deripaska, in an effort to undertake activities on their behalf. Manafort worked with Kilimnik starting in 2016 on narratives that sought to undermine evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election.

The Committee found that Manafort's presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. Taken as a whole, Manafort's high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik and associates of Oleg Deripaska, represented a grave counterintelligence threat"


That is only one of dozens of examples of collusion in the report. You might want to read it sometime as you seem woefully misinformed. Here's the link: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/...rt_volume5.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 10:57 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,385,616 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
What planet do you live on?

This, from your Republican lead Senate Investigation.

"Beginning while he was Campaign chairman and continuing until at least until 2018, Manafort discussed with Kilimnik a peace plan for eastern Ukraine that benefited the Kremlin. After the election, Manafort continued to coordinate with Russian persons, particularly Kilimnik and other individuals close to Deripaska, in an effort to undertake activities on their behalf. Manafort worked with Kilimnik starting in 2016 on narratives that sought to undermine evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election.

The Committee found that Manafort's presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. Taken as a whole, Manafort's high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik and associates of Oleg Deripaska, represented a grave counterintelligence threat"


That is only one of dozens of examples of collusion in the report. You might want to read it sometime as you seem woefully misinformed. Here's the link: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/...rt_volume5.pdf
Also, how much $$$ did the .gov seize from Manafort, again?

...Paul Manafort, Donald Trump’s second 2016 election campaign manager, pleaded guilty to two federal charges in September 2018...As part of the agreement, Manafort agreed to forfeit $46 million in assets, including three bank accounts, four houses, a life insurance policy, and his condominium in Trump Tower...

https://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2018/...of-46-million/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,321,536 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
You mean that if MSM had published fake stories about Hunter Biden, then Joe would have lost? Well, that's scary.

The laptop at the computer shop was Hunter's. The hard drive contains thousands of emails as well as pictures of Hunter with missing teeth from his meth addiction, and all the fun he was having with hookers. Digital tracers from multiple sources were used to confirm if the digital footprints belong to Hunter, and all of them do. They all trace back to him.


It's his laptop. He typed up those emails. He was addicted to meth and loved having sex with hookers, and we have photographic evidence of how much "fun" he was having. The gun that was tossed in the dumpster was Hunter's. Time for you to accept the truth.

Last edited by DK736; 05-26-2021 at 11:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 11:16 AM
 
21,939 posts, read 9,508,101 times
Reputation: 19464
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Why it is fraud when Trump lost but is wasn't fraud when Hillary lost by the same electoral vote. Perhaps someone was a sore loser and riled up his supporters telling them it was fraud because he couldn't accept it. It really is time to move on from this. He lost because he was voted out by the majority. Why make it something it wasn't.
Because there were many situations that showed there was fraud....like votes being changed live on TV .....what's your explanation for that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 11:17 AM
 
21,939 posts, read 9,508,101 times
Reputation: 19464
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Courts dismissed more than 50 lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud & irregularities presented by Donald Trump & allies.

US election security officials have said the election was “the most secure in American history”.
Yeah, all the people who cheated said that. Funny how they said Russia interfered in 2016 but never showed us all the proof they had. I have seen far more proof that Democrats cheated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 11:19 AM
DKM
 
Location: California
6,767 posts, read 3,860,522 times
Reputation: 6690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
so why are Democrats fighting audits with every fiber of their being? Wouldn't they want the proof of no fraud to come out? Don't tell me it's about saving money. Democrats are never shy about spending money.
The only people I see fighting audits are Republican state officials in AZ and GA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 11:39 AM
 
21,939 posts, read 9,508,101 times
Reputation: 19464
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
That's been debunked.

TRUMP, claiming that a Fulton County election worker fed ballots through a machine three times instead of only once, saying his campaign would release a video proving it: “It can’t be disputed. We have a version that you haven’t seen, but it’s magnified. It’s magnified and you can see everything. For some reason, they put it in three times each ballot. And I don’t know why, I don’t know why three times and not five times, right?”

THE FACTS: There was no double or triple tallying of ballots. Raffensperger noted that ballots in Georgia have been counted and then recounted twice more for accuracy, including once by hand, and no discrepancy showed up in the Fulton County ballots, as it would have if someone improperly counted votes multiple times. “We did an audit of that,” Raffensperger told Trump. “It was proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times
.” Source: https://apnews.com/article/ap-fact-c...6109885f7dafa9

Yeah, what about them? Where did they go? I remember that busty blond gal Giuliani called and ended up being so funny SNL made a skit of it. LOL. What became of her?

And speaking of Giuliani, remember that time he finally got his day in court and was forced to admit to the judge that they weren't claiming voter fraud at all?

So go ahead, give us some more stories you want debunked. It's all out there, I'll help you.
OH, please. They say it's debunked when clearly it's not. They said all the Ukraine stuff with Hunter Biden was debunked and clearly it was not. They said the laptop wasn't his. It was. How many times do they have to lie to you before you start to wonder?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 11:40 AM
 
21,939 posts, read 9,508,101 times
Reputation: 19464
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
If you don't trust the AP, you simply are in denial. AP has been the official vote reporting news service in both state and federal elections since 1848. They have an impeccable record of factual reporting and have won 56 Pulitzer prizes.

I challenge you give even one example of AP publishing false information

And you won't trust the Georgia Secretary of state who ran the election, and who is a Republican.

So basically you reject all credible data, and all the only person on this earth you trust is Trump. Got it.
AP is not credible. I am sorry to disappoint you. I see evidence of their bias all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2021, 12:11 PM
 
22,473 posts, read 12,003,345 times
Reputation: 20398
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
They don't care and will keep on keeping on with their narrative. It's a sickness.
So...according to you it's a "sickness" to want to be sure that going forward all our elections are safe and secure

You have that all wrong
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top