Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you answer revulsion, then you're only strengthening the case for non consent, because most people aren't going to consent to something that revolts them.
Let the buyer beware. I don't want my tax dollars spent protecting idiots from getting blown by a crossdresser or tranny.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 13 days ago)
35,646 posts, read 18,006,664 times
Reputation: 50687
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo
Let the buyer beware. I don't want my tax dollars spent protecting idiots from getting blown by a crossdresser or tranny.
ABSOLUTELY. I don't want the courts and jails filled with people who tried to give a BJ to someone who didn't even look at them, and then the recipient screamed victim afterwards.
Let the buyer beware. I don't want my tax dollars spent protecting idiots from getting blown by a crossdresser or tranny.
Who has the protection though? - only the person who holds all the cards, and doesn't need to show them. Their sense of self is being protected, at the expense of another's person's right to practice their sexual orientation free from persecution or an attempt to undermine it.
Your logic would mean that a person could be married for 50 years without ever telling their partner that they aren't what they appear.
ABSOLUTELY. I don't want the courts and jails filled with people who tried to give a BJ to someone who didn't even look at them, and then the recipient screamed victim afterwards.
Caveat emptor.
What good does looking at them do, if they look like a real woman?
ABSOLUTELY. I don't want the courts and jails filled with people who tried to give a BJ to someone who didn't even look at them, and then the recipient screamed victim afterwards.
Caveat emptor.
It isn't caveat emptor if the facts are not disclosed. That is deception and since it involves sex it is a sex crime.
So it is okay to murder a person if they misrepresented themselves for sex. Wow. I mean, that never happens--does it. Not rape in the least. Jeez. Words have meaning. Anyway, the violent reaction tells us more about the murderer criminal.
What if a white passing black women misrepresented herself as white on a hook-up app. To the OP, the man who is disgusted with black people has every right to stomp this woman to death once he finds out he let a black woman blow him. I, of course, disagree with either one of these scenarios and the murderers should rot in prison for the rest of their lives. Period.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 13 days ago)
35,646 posts, read 18,006,664 times
Reputation: 50687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90
What good does looking at them do, if they look like a real woman?
This is a very long thread, and this is about a man who looks like a man and hasn't taken any hormones at all, and has an Adam's apple and would have a normal deep male voice giving a BJ for free to someone he doesn't know.
This murderer didn't even glance at the BJ giver, or engage in a 1 minute conversation with him.
The victim wouldn't have looked like a woman, or sounded like one either. And if you can't take 15 seconds to assess your sex partner, that's totally on you. You don't have the right to stomp someone to death you didn't even look at before engaging in sex with them.
This is a very long thread, and this is about a man who looks like a man and hasn't taken any hormones at all, and has an Adam's apple and would have a normal deep male voice giving a BJ for free to someone he doesn't know.
This murderer didn't even glance at the BJ giver, or engage in a 1 minute conversation with him.
He wouldn't have looked like a woman, or sounded like one either. And if you can't take 15 seconds to assess your sex partner, that's totally on you.
Not overly interested in this particular case - seems a pretty open and shut case.
But a trans that looks like a real women, and compromises another's right to practice their sexual orientation free from threat or deception, is a predator, and touching genitals is sexual assault.
Not overly interested in this particular case - seems a pretty open and shut case.
But a trans that looks like a real women, and compromises another's right to practice their sexual orientation free from threat or deception, is a predator, and touching genitals is sexual assault.
Exactly!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
