Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It appears to be just another cog in the machinery of change that has been going on for some time. There is now noting off limits, nothing untouchable. What next?
Over the years I have been intrigued how the definition of “ family” has changed. It used to be strictly based on blood and law. A blood relative or an “ in Law” , meaning becoming part of the family by legal contract . Marriage .
Now? I guess it means anyone that lives together under the same roof.
Whatever gender a person identifies as, if that person gives birth, that person is a mother. "Birthing person" is a really stupid term IMO.
I agree. It makes it sound like a woman is a machine that has a certain function. Next, the loons won't call her a person but a birthing "thing" or "apparatus"
Interesting considering the same sentence speaks about maternal mortality and maternal health.
Yes, it is inconsistent and demonstrates a lack of conviction in the absurd bastardisation of language.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
