Mississippi asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; says 1973 decision was "egregiously wrong" (European, location)

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by LordSquidworth

Fine. Make them have them.

So when they leave the babies in dumpsters are you going to take care of the babies?

That's their responsibility. Who doesn't know that actions have consequences?

[LordSquidworth]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

That's their responsibility. Who doesn't know that actions have consequences?

Rofl.

It's going to be your tax dollar responsibility.

You cannot force people to be parents.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Blondy

I've already given you 2.

You've given two convenience reasons. My point stands.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Blondy

They won't be restricting it on your infertility irresponsibility theory

They'll be restricting it on the basis that they already allow restrictions on the 2nd Amendment.

[WRM20]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Abortion rights are restricted to protect the lives of innocent children.

There aren't any children being killed, just fetuses and embryos. Future children, perhaps, assuming no miscarriage.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

You've given two convenience reasons. My point stands.

Most people don't think their economic status is a matter of convenience.

Aren't you the person who said the economy is the most important issue to people when they vote?

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

The FACT remains that just as states can restrict 2nd Amendment Rights, they can also restrict any perceived right to abortion.

No, they can't unless the Supreme Court greenlights them to do so.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Yes, it is. One can do all of that with a baby.

Not if you can't pay for tuition and childcare or you're in a tenuous financial situation.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by Ellis Bell

You're right, it's a matter of servitude.

Depends on your circumstances and your point of view.

[StillwaterTownie]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

The FACT remains that just as states can restrict 2nd Amendment Rights, they can also restrict any perceived right to abortion.

But many 2nd Amendment rights supporters do not think guns can be restricted, because a key part of the 2nd Amendment say "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

So, you should feel quite good that following overturning of Roe vs Wade that states are in a better position to ban all abortion but never all guns.