Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Women who have abortions are neither of those things. I always wonder why anti-abortionists have to try to make it seem like women seeking an abortion are malevolent. It's none of the anti-abortionists business whether a woman has an abortion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
What makes you think a woman who intends to kill her unborn child isn't either deliberately malevolent or cognitively impaired? Those basically are the only options when one deliberately kills another for any reason other than self-defense when one's life is in provable imminent danger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
It's because they're deliberately choosing to kill another human life which has done absolutely NOTHING to warrant the death penalty.
How many abortions are done to babies that resulted from rape or incest, or babies that threaten the lives of the mother?
, it ended at this moment, as it signaled the most consequential POTUS term of my lifetime. Taking us to a new Strict Constitutionalist 2 decades of SC decision-making, which has only just begun.
No. I have not. You persist in using a twisted definition of convenience to spew your misogynistic views in order to disparage women from the bubble of your own privilege.
Have at it. I will continue to reject it every time you post it. But, stop pretending it is something real worthy of discussion.
Yes, you have. Here are the reason you've listed for why women seek abortion for the 98+% of abortions that are NOT due to medical necessity, rape, or incest:
Those are ALL matters of convenience, not necessity.
What is sad about that? Neither gender is in lockstep, like braindead zombies. If they were, that would be sad.
Correct, and pre-Roe most states had no exceptions for convenience abortions for rape or incest or even medical necessity. Things may or may not have become more liberal since then. I think overall you'd see more states allow for convenience exceptions in the cases of rape, incest, and medical necessity but certainly not all. It's God's will after all. That is the approach that some states will take, but probably not most.
I have seen little evidence of her not caring about that issue.
I also suspect based on laws passed, all over the US, a large quantity of states will allow abortions if medical necessity is the issue (meaning risk to either mother or child btw). In addition, pre Roe women drove, took buses, trains, etc to get abortions, and I doubt this generation is any less able to do so.
I have seen little evidence of her not caring about that issue.
I also suspect based on laws passed, all over the US, a large quantity of states will allow abortions if medical necessity is the issue (meaning risk to either mother or child btw). In addition, pre Roe women drove, took buses, trains, etc to get abortions, and I doubt this generation is any less able to do so.
Where were these women taking trains and buses to since abortion was illegal in every state.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
, it ended at this moment, as it signaled the most consequential POTUS term of my lifetime. Taking us to a new Strict Constitutionalist 2 decades of SC decision-making, which has only just begun.