Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yup. While it may not be the majority of the nation as a whole that does definitely want to move back it very much is in certain states, a number of them and some pretty large ones.
There's also move back and move back. Idaho for example moved "forward" from pre-Roe times in that they have exceptions for rape and incest. Texas moved "forward" from pre-Roe in that they have an exception for medical necessity, but not convenience abortions for rape or incest. Both are examples of a middle ground that's not all the way back to pre-Roe but definitely much farther back than under Roe. Both Idaho and Texas are six week states which is sort of a wimpy way of not completely banning them as really most people are barely going to be figuring out they missed a period at six weeks. Other states are restricting it down from the more common 23 weeks to 12 or 15 weeks. States will figure that stuff out fairly quickly.
At least in comparison to the yahoos in DC at any rate. Although generally it's a good thing that they move so slowly on everything. Real silver lining there, DC actually passing legislation without spending 6,000 hours bickering behind the scenes and then ramming through a 7,000 page bill in 48 hours nobody has read is bad enough. Imagine if they did it more regularly. Yikes
Well if this overturn was to occur it will return many states back to the stone age which some have barely crawled out of.
By the Stone Age, do you mean where people make informed responsible decisions about who to have a relationship with and sleep with?
As opposed to the rutting animals in blue states, who have sex with anyone they meet and then just kill the baby if they get pregnant? They're so much more enlightened.
Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.
You are a man. You couldn't possibly understand as you don't have the requisite parts and have never had them go through the ordeal of pushing out nine pounds (in my case) of human flesh. Things are just never the same afterwards, and some of us have issues that are unpleasant and permanent. Again, how would you understand this if you've never experienced it?
So do you. But you care nothing for the woman, who you only see as an incubator. Her body doesn't count to you.
How about every time a women experiences an unwanted pregnancy the man who impregnated her undergoes a vasectomy to assure it never happens again? Would you be in favor of that? And if not, why not? Why is his body any less responsible than hers?
It is for many women. And you get no say in that until you acquire a uterus and then are forced to incubate a baby that you don't want. Then we'll talk.
Weird how back in 2021 we had no problem defining what a woman is. Fast forward to 2022 and men can have abortions too!
I'm not a lawyer but to me abortion is one of the things that is not addressed one way or the other in the constitution. It is nowhere mentioned as a right in the constitution and so is left to individual states, like driving a car or riding a horse is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
