Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The hard copy, and the vast variations between states makes this far too difficult to pull off.
Now something at a state level? I could see that argument. But nationally with dozens of different systems, and thousands of counties? Yeah no.
You are 100% dead on that a secondary system to verify the first is needed. Its why we have so many voting systems with a paper trail. Ive seen suggestions of all digital, but that would be just begging for disaster.
I could design an all digital system with little trouble. Easiest way would be transfer the data from the voting machines every few minutes. You set up a transfer system that will transfer only data. It will require clean data and no code. In fact perhaps use different memory. The check machine runs off one which is not remotely modifiable and the data from the voting machine goes into another memory which can deal only with data. None of this is hard.
And all of this goes on at the state level. No reason to have the feds involved. Perhaps 4 or 5 different systems selectable by the state or the state can have their own built.
"August 11, 2021 2:03PM PT
Cyber Symposium—Bigger than PCAP
Mesa County Colorado election official, Tina Peters, provided Lindell's Symposium with machine images of before and after Dominion "update." This provided conclusive proof that Dominion actively deleted voting data in Mesa County machines.
This is a clear violation of Federal election laws at the hands of Dominion.
Had Tina not suspected Dominion, those machine images would not have been captured.
Great job Tina Peters!
@ArizonaAuditLiveFeeds"
This is the sideshow.
The main event is the revelation of the cyber data and packet captures from the 2020 November Election.
Also because reportedly the one guy in that room who stood up and questioned the validity of the packet captures that had been presented so far got himself removed from the room by security.
Under such circumstances, Mike Lindell's $5 million is more secure than the gold in Fort Knox.
"During this event, Mike Lindell will be revealing cyber data and packet captures from the 2020 November Election. For our attendees, they have one goal. Find proof that this cyber data is not valid data from the November Election. For the people who are able to find the evidence, 5 million is their reward. Seems insane, right? But this is real!"
The cyber data and packet captures have not been provided to the experts in attendance, so no.
To be fair, they have a whole lot of that. Nothing, that is.
but they have twice as much today than they had yesterday and will probably double that by tomorrow.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
