Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Every retailer in San Francisco should shut their doors and move out of that cesspool of a city. No grocery stores, no pharmacies, no restaurants, nothing.
Let the entire place dry up and blow away. It is a worthless city full of lowlife liberals and a worthless leftist government.
^ Would love to see that but there is still plenty of business to be made there so most large retailers will still keep a presence there albeit with lots more safeguards.
I tried to google Louis Vuitton cost vs. purchase price, and couldn't find it. It CERTAINLY seems like they have at least 500% mark up. There is no reason to charge the price they do for comparable leather goods, that you can source elsewhere for very little cost.
So maybe the management at Louis Vuitton figures, sit there and watch the merchandise leave the room by theft, if you get a few paying customers here and there, you'll still make an outrageous profit?
LV is obviously overpriced and they make a huge margin on each sale - most of their products don’t get sold, and they then sell their unsold items to discount outlets and finally the rights to some designs to low cost designers like Zara.
The hyperbolic nonsense posted above is even more insane.
I agree. In highly red state Oklahoma, the shoplifting limit before it becomes a felony was raised to $1000, but I never see anybody on here complaining about it.
Democrats encourage and condone this type of activity, so I’m not sure why city leaders would be upset about this.
Democrats encourage it? Just what do you think the REPUBLICAN governor of Oklahoma was doing when on one day he let loose out of prison over 400 people? It's believed that no other governor in history ever set free that many people from prison in one day.
Sounds like the Bay Area needs Kyle and a few friends to come in and protect the city. Local "law makers" prevent the police from doing so, and it sounds like the residents aren't lifting a finger. Once a few of these trash assume ambient temperature the problem will go away.
What I'm saying is, this is probably the reason they're not actively protecting their stores.
Because they can sell a few items and that would make up for massive theft.
This isn't new that they're not bothering to protect their stores, it's been going on for a few years. Apparently if they sell some of their merch for what their asking, they're good.
So what you're really saying is... "Store owner's are bad. Looter's are good, poor and entitled to the stuff."
Louis Vuitton store looted by 12 or more suspect smashed windows and emptied the store in minutes. Police were able to stop one car, but others got away.
Another video shows stream of handbag thieves sprinting out of San Francisco Neiman Marcus. Stores closing early like CVS no longer open past 7pm nation wide. City leaders are upset giving the police department a week to come up with a solution.
When you decriminalize theft, and everyone is wearing masks difficult to identify anyone on video used to be illegal to wear masks in some states. Business's have been complaining liberal city leaders blame it on poverty and high homeless population. I suspect these are not homeless more then likely they are gangs, and criminal enterprises.
What did people think was going to happen when riots were excused last summer, and shoplifting is allowed and not stopped at a lot of these larger stores?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.