Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They may, they may not. Like most Congressional investigations it will be a long process but the findings will be published so we will all find out together. I see no problem with the current ongoing process given this is how all congressional investigations do.
In fact, I cannot think of one congressional investigation that was short. Iran Contra was long, Clinton was long, Bengazi was long, Trump was long, am I missing a short one?
It’s been 5+ years, but certainly continue with the goosechase. It’s just taxpayers wasted time and money.
Lol. Nobody said anything about a cutoff, just that it’s been 15+ months since 1/6 and still nothing to show for it.
Trump had nothing to do with it. It's looking more and more that the democrats were behind the whole thing with the DC police coming forward and admitting they were told by the mayor of DC to let the people into the Capital.
So face it, Trump had nothing to do with it and he's never EVER going to jail, and like it or not, it's looking like he's going to make a big come back.
Considering because Trump had nothing to do with it, that is a terrible excuse.
Beginning in 2016, before the nomination, Trump made very clear his followers would become violent if/ if not Fill in the Blank.
Referring to one’s base as followers is creepy cult talk. Trump continuously fired up a faction of his base throughout 2016- 1/6/2021.
We know, with certainty, many who travelled to DC for the big event , fancied themselves to be a part of a violent revolution and Trump’s speech incited many to take matters into their own hands, while Trump conveniently retreated to the WH.
In the end, each person who engaged, was responsible for their own actions.
Beginning in 2016, before the nomination, Trump made very clear his followers would become violent if/ if not Fill in the Blank.
Referring to one’s base as followers is creepy cult talk. Trump continuously fired up a faction of his base throughout 2016- 1/6/2021.
We know, with certainty, many who travelled to DC for the big event , fancied themselves to be a part of a violent revolution and Trump’s speech incited many to take matters into their own hands, while Trump conveniently retreated to the WH.
In the end, each person who engaged, was responsible for their own actions.
Except there’s zero proof that because Trump had anything to do with 1/6, but you certainly have a right to your opinion on how you interpret what he said.
You are correct that each person that engaged was responsible for their own actions…but considering there’s zero proof, the excuse that the person used isn’t going to hold up, hence the judge didn’t see it their way.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
24,052 posts, read 12,813,773 times
Reputation: 10655
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom
Beginning in 2016, before the nomination, Trump made very clear his followers would become violent if/ if not Fill in the Blank.
Referring to one’s base as followers is creepy cult talk. Trump continuously fired up a faction of his base throughout 2016- 1/6/2021.
We know, with certainty, many who travelled to DC for the big event , fancied themselves to be a part of a violent revolution and Trump’s speech incited many to take matters into their own hands, while Trump conveniently retreated to the WH.
In the end, each person who engaged, was responsible for their own actions.
Are you speaking about when blm antifa would beat Trump supporters without his supporters fighting back?
I don't recall Hillary, or any of the other dems, calling blm antifa off.
Are you speaking about when blm antifa would beat Trump supporters without his supporters fighting back?
I don't recall Hillary, or any of the other dems, calling blm antifa off.
If course the guy is a nutter....but the optics of a Trump supporter blaming Trump for his actions on that day supports the narrative some have that Trump played an integral part in encouraging the lawlessness on that day.
So the jury went against the Democrats who have been stating such for the last year+.
No. Work on reading comprehension.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense
Appeals are made when the verdict doesn't go the defendant's way but rarely are made on grounds of the actual verdict especially if it is a jury trial. They are made on actions the judge did(or did not) make during the trial. If he showed the same bias and prejudice during the trial that is 100% something the defense would use as a basis for appeal.
1. There was much testimony about Trump at trial.
2. Impartiality has to do with the defendant; not some uncharged co-conspirator.
3. The jury had been discharged by the time the judge made his statement about Trump.
Any appeal would fail.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense
And yes I did say "IF" as I have not read the entire transcript of the trial(and doubt you have either), and have no plans to. But if there is something there you can be sure that the defense attorneys will bring it out.
The defense was predicated on their allegation that Trump was bad. So they could appeal and say the judge was prejudiced against Trump? Not likely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense
Yes, but did his bias influence what evidence was allowed/not allowed...He doesn't get to that.
You seen any evidence the judge was biased against the defendant?
But unlike you, I'm not ignoring the glaring evidence that things are not as the dem's want everyone to believe.
No, you're ignoring the signed confessions of two leaders of Trump supporters as to what they did and did not do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
