Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The verdict was unanimous, among all the jurors chosen by both sides.
Sussman was Not Guilty because the prosecutor couldn't prove the merits of his extraordinarily weak case, even after three years of working on it. Deal with it.
Because the jury was deliberating on the wrong item. They were there to decide if Sussman lied to the FBI., That was the purpose of the trial, but they were debating on whether or not the case should have ever been brought to trial. A bought and paid for jury who was both ignorant and corrupt..
The democrat way...
The forewoman stated so in her post trial interview..
^Poor Hillary
You have no one to blame but Hillary and your hero boy scout Comey for that.
Trump wasn't damaged?
Did the FBI release any public information about their investigations of members of the Trump team prior to the election? No they did not. Those investigations actually led to convictions.
Because the jury was deliberating on the wrong item. They were there to decide if Sussman lied to the FBI., That was the purpose of the trial, but they were debating on whether or not the case should have ever been brought to trial. A bought and paid for jury who was both ignorant and corrupt..
The democrat way...
The forewoman stated so in her post trial interview..
Everybody involved is crooked if the verdict didn't go your way. Got it.
It didn't help matters that John Durham is an incompetent Trump toady who totally humiliated himself by bringing a laughable case to court. A good prosecutor never goes to court unless he is 99.99% certain he can prove guilt to a jury.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,599 posts, read 12,543,921 times
Reputation: 10477
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth
Did the FBI release any public information about their investigations of members of the Trump team prior to the election? No they did not. Those investigations actually led to convictions.
He'd probably felt he'd had no reason to cover his own butt with the Trump investigation, like he'd done with Clinton.
Besides, like many, he thought Clinton was destined to win, that there was no way she would lose to Trump even with his little announcement of reopening her investigation.
You have to love an article about lying written by a person whose former employer complained about his tendency to write articles containing false narratives and omissions of key known facts.
Sussmann was wrongly cleared but he gave us something better, Crooked Hillary Clinton thrown under a greyhound bus.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
