Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In the Paul Pelosi attack thread, a CD dem stated no one listens to or is influenced by President Biden.
In this thread, you argue no one listens to or is influenced by ex-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
It seems no one listens to the most prominent Democrats, yet even the most obscure MAGA social media "influencers" can turn hoards of conservatives into racist Nazis.
And they kept going with that two years later? And they instigated a mob to stop the electoral count from happening? And they called election officials and secretaries of state, threatening them? Interesting.
I agree, it doesn't completely match up with Team Trump but quite a bit of it does. I just posted things that I could find that were well sourced.
They kept up cries of illegitimacy for his entire presidency.
I do note that you glossed past everything that did match up...and it's sourced too.
In the Paul Pelosi attack thread, a CD dem stated no one listens to or is influenced by President Biden.
In this thread, you argue no one listens to or is influenced by ex-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
It seems no one listens to the most prominent Democrats, yet even the most obscure MAGA social media "influencers" can turn hoards of conservatives into racist Nazis.
I only need to listen to MAGAs. They are the one's running people for SOS all over the country who say they will decided what votes get counted.
I would definitely have called her out had she filed 60 frivolous lawsuits, fomented an insurrection, sent a case up to the Supreme Court to try and have Clarence Thomas delay the election results, called and threatened election officials and secretaries of states and still be talking about it two years later. Sure, I'd call her out on it then. Until then, it's a nothing burger.
So, as long as you don't do it as much as "this" then you're good with it.
How can Ms. Clinton question election results that have not occurred yet? The only ones that have been erroneously questioning election results are the MAGAs--2+ years later. What Ms. Clinton is saying is that the right-wing controlled Supreme Court could allow states to throw away all votes and declare their preferred winner. This could/would happen in R controlled states. They are already setting up for this...
A MAGA accusation is really a confession. Cheers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga
you'll have to ask hildawg. they're her words.
It is important to read my whole posting. I explain it. Carry on...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
