Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Liberals support the sexual indoctrination of students, allowing pornographic books and rainbow flags in schools, drag queen story hour, and field trips to drag queen shows.
Would those same liberals allow religious education in schools, religious books, crosses on the wall, priests and nun story hour, and field trips to churches?
Why should a transgender student have affirming support, but not a Christian child?
I went to public school "back in the day" before all this tranny madness. There was always sexuality in the classroom. A whole bunch of young people with raging hormones coursing through their vains... I remember well the cleavage, visible thong straps, tight as can be clothing and short shorts... The teacher didn't have to teach most of us anything. We are humans. We can figure stuff out on our own and we did.
"Sex ed" was like a couple weeks or something. They made us carry around "flour babies". It was pretty tame, but they covered the basics of what these tools are that we have been equipped with, along with how to use them and how to protect them. It was all very mild. They did show us parts in a book, but it's not like we didn't already see all that stuff by then. I grew up in a house with internet. One of the first on the block. By the time sex ed happened, they really didn't have to teach me much of anything. It's all out there for anyone who wants to see it, and it's not like they go through much effort to stop kids from seeing that stuff.
Now they are doing all the gay and tranny stuff, probably because "sex ed" has been predominately about straight sex in the past, but 10% of the population (at least) identifies as homosexual. So there are many people who felt excluded. I don't see anything wrong with covering the basics. Since these behavior are fairly common, it should at least be talked about.
As for religion, well that's easy. Separation of church and state was decided ages ago. There are religious based schools that parents can sign their children up for. There are plenty of options available for parents interested in alternatives to k-12, but it's not cheap.
Matters of faith only belong in schools in comparative religion type social studies. But many of the indoctrinated don't like those as it shows how much copy/paste there is between them and inconsistencies they have.
Wide brush you paint liberals with. Not all liberals agree or think alike on the individual issues you bring up. My guess is in public school separation of church and state would come into play. If you don’t like what’s being taught/supported in schools or what isn’t taught or supported there’s always homeschooling or private schools.
Matters of faith only belong in schools in comparative religion type social studies. But many of the indoctrinated don't like those as it shows how much copy/paste there is between them and inconsistencies they have.
Why do 20% of the next generation believe that they are LGBTQ?
Because they're not being taught shame if they are? Like the indoctrination of previous generations?
Or maybe teaching young, impressionable people that they should be proud of being homosexuals encourages more homosexual behaviors? I'm a live and let live person, but I don't feel it should be a goal to convince young people that they should want to be homosexuals, trans, etc. That's why some people are calling teachers that push this stuff "groomers". People need to make those decision on their own, free from bias and coercion.
Because they're not being taught shame if they are? Like the indoctrination of previous generations?
I guess I'm one of the "previous" generations and if given the choice..indoctrinated about religion is much easier to change than being indoctrinated about being a transgender and getting my bits chopped off.
Religion is very much the lesser evil if you want to compare indoctrinations.
Or maybe teaching young, impressionable people that they should be proud of being homosexuals encourages more homosexual behaviors? I'm a live and let live person, but I don't feel it should be a goal to convince young people that they should want to be homosexuals, trans, etc. People need to make those decision on their own, free from bias and coercion.
What's being taught is that it's OK and that these types of people and relationships exist.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
