NY-03 Rep Elect George Santos- Biography Entire Fabrication? (Franken, Putin, polls)

[Kaphawoman]

Originally Posted by TMSRetired

If only citizens can serve how did he get on the ballot ? How did he get that far in the process to get elected even ?

That's what I want to know. Is his paperwork fraudulent?

[Kaphawoman]

I knew about the Jewish claim but now I see old tweets where he claims to be half-black and gave both 9/11 and Christmas Eve (several years later) as his mother's death date. This guy is a piece of work.

[ClaraC]

At this point, maybe the media should treat this the way they treat people who arrive at a hospital unconscious with no ID on them.

Publish a pic in the media, and ask "does anyone in the public know who this guy is"?

[366h34d]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

First off, great sourcing...oh wait, you didn't source anything...Hmmmm I wonder why? Oh yeah it's because you're making up crap.

1. Yep, had a DNA test.

2. Yep 6-10 years back so at best, 1.5% or so and at worst...0.1%

1/2 ^ 6 = 64

1/2^ 8 = 256

1/2^ 10 = 1,024

Stop making crap up, not sourcing it and hoping nobody calls you out as you lay down a partisan smoke screen.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/10/th...rens-dna-test/

P.S. The only accurate thing about your post was why arbitrary imposition of rules around lying are worthless. We can always find someone to come along and layer on another lie.

I will not read too much into those fact-check websites, since 99.99999999% are "Trump is bad and Left is good" and who fact-check the fact-checker , anyway, warren needed to apologizes to CHerokkee Native American

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/15/65746...rican-ancestry
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/01/69080...n-for-dna-test

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

First off, great sourcing...oh wait, you didn't source anything...Hmmmm I wonder why? Oh yeah it's because you're making up crap.

1. Yep, had a DNA test.

2. Yep 6-10 years back so at best, 1.5% or so and at worst...0.1%

1/2 ^ 6 = 64

1/2^ 8 = 256

1/2^ 10 = 1,024

Stop making crap up, not sourcing it and hoping nobody calls you out as you lay down a partisan smoke screen.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/10/th...rens-dna-test/

P.S. The only accurate thing about your post was why arbitrary imposition of rules around lying are worthless. We can always find someone to come along and layer on another lie.

Here is a good article on Warren's DNA test, depending which side you fall on you can make a case one way or the other. But to equate her claims to Santos history is absolutely incomparable, the claims made by Santos is like no other politician, ever.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...test-is-wrong/

[thriftylefty]

I think the picture of him with his hand on the bible getting sworn in will be a historic photo for the ages. Every Democrat should get a copy of it since it will be a turning point or at least a bookmark in the history of the GOP.

[Kaphawoman]

Is his real name George Santos and is he actually gay (he was married to a woman....or was he?)? He seems to have rolled together several identity groups to set himself apart.

[366h34d]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Here is a good article on Warren's DNA test, depending which side you fall on you can make a case one way or the other. But to equate her claims to Santos history is absolutely incomparable, the claims made by Santos is like no other politician, ever.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...test-is-wrong/

Incomparable or not, that is not the point. Unless he broke the law, nothing we can do. Then, of course, he is a GOP, MSM will eat him alive for that

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by 366h34d

Incomparable or not, that is not the point. Unless he broke the law, nothing we can do. Then, of course, he is a GOP, MSM will eat him alive for that

I agree, he will take office next week either way, judging at tired of these ridiculous comparisons.

[Leo58]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

No, it said she did have Native genetic markers equivalent to 1/64th which would be 8 to 10 generations back.


im not deep into genealogy, i dont know the difference between a DNA test and a genetic markers test. but it seems the argument that she had no Native DNA comes from the fact that she didnt technically take a DNA test.

Trump said he would pay $1 million if Warren took a DNA test proving Native American heritage. She took the test, and technically it proved she has Native American heritage, however weak. Trump never paid up; he lied, plain and simple.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/15/eliz...ty-pledge.html