Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-02-2023, 09:38 AM
 
5,921 posts, read 2,755,287 times
Reputation: 3432

Advertisements

Globally, more CO2 was emitted in 2022 than any year on record.

Global carbon dioxide emissions rose by 0.9% in 2022 to 36.8 BILLION tonnes - their highest level on record, report reveals

Good thing we've spent trillions of dollars de-carbonizing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2023, 09:40 AM
 
6,340 posts, read 2,892,672 times
Reputation: 7273
Probably caused by John kerry jetting around trying to save the planet. lol.


John Kerry's family private jet emitted over 300 metric tons of carbon since Biden took office

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joh...en-took-office
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 09:49 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,000,087 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAN_Man View Post
Globally, more CO2 was emitted in 2022 than any year on record.

Global carbon dioxide emissions rose by 0.9% in 2022 to 36.8 BILLION tonnes - their highest level on record, report reveals

Good thing we've spent trillions of dollars de-carbonizing.

https://www.voanews.com/a/carbon-dio...e%20of%20power.
Extreme weather events intensified last year's carbon dioxide emissions: Droughts reduced the amount of water available for hydropower, which increased the need to burn fossil fuels. And heat waves drove up demand for electricity.


Carbon dioxide emissions from coal grew 1.6% last year. Many communities, primarily in Asia, switched from natural gas to coal to avoid high natural gas prices that were worsened by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the IEA said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 09:59 AM
 
18,432 posts, read 8,264,501 times
Reputation: 13764
don't suppose China building a record number of coal plants had anything to do with it

March 2, 2023
China is building six times more new coal plants than other countries, report finds

It's the equivalent of about two new coal power plants per week.

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/02/11604...also%20booming.

=====

China's new coal plant approvals surge in 2022

- China approved the construction of another 106 gigawatts of coal-fired power capacity last year, four times higher than a year earlier and the highest since 2015

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-p...ch-2023-02-27/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:03 AM
 
18,432 posts, read 8,264,501 times
Reputation: 13764
...and just for the record....the increase in CO2 did not come from the USA, the EU, Japan, or even Russia

they have not increased CO2 emissions in over 50 years.........

it all came from China > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ederations.png

...for over 50 years.....all of the increase in CO2 has come from China
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:15 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,722 posts, read 7,601,368 times
Reputation: 14995
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAN_Man View Post
Globally, more CO2 was emitted in 2022 than any year on record.

Global carbon dioxide emissions rose by 0.9% in 2022 to 36.8 BILLION tonnes - their highest level on record, report reveals

Good thing we've spent trillions of dollars de-carbonizing.
OK, I gotta ask: When was it decided that "emitting CO2" was a BAD thing? And that we should judge people's "badness" by somehow measuring how much CO2 they emit? We do it when we breathe, don't we?

Anybody got a link to the report that proved "emitting CO2" was a bad thing?

It looked to me like this conclusion simply appeared from whole cloth, with no effort to explain WHY it was bad, what methods were employed to determine its degree of "badness", what the acceptable limits were, and what would happen to us if we reduced or stopped emitting CO2. Such information would go a long way toward explaining why so much of our economy and life style have been abruptly altered and changed toward "emit less CO2" in the last decade or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:28 AM
 
5,921 posts, read 2,755,287 times
Reputation: 3432
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Carbon dioxide emissions from coal grew 1.6% last year. Many communities, primarily in Asia, switched from natural gas to coal to avoid high natural gas prices that were worsened by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the IEA said.
[/i][/b]
Yep. Also keep in mind that Europe began to shutter their nuclear power plants, relied on natural gas from Russia (Trump tried to warn them - LOL), so when there was a natural gas disruption (like NS pipelines being sabotaged in response to a war) people in Europe started to import wood from South America (a renewable resource) and re-fired their coal power plants for heat.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:30 AM
 
5,921 posts, read 2,755,287 times
Reputation: 3432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
OK, I gotta ask: When was it decided that "emitting CO2" was a BAD thing? And that we should judge people's "badness" by somehow measuring how much CO2 they emit? We do it when we breathe, don't we?

Anybody got a link to the report that proved "emitting CO2" was a bad thing?

It looked to me like this conclusion simply appeared from whole cloth, with no effort to explain WHY it was bad, what methods were employed to determine its degree of "badness", what the acceptable limits were, and what would happen to us if we reduced or stopped emitting CO2. Such information would go a long way toward explaining why so much of our economy and life style have been abruptly altered and changed toward "emit less CO2" in the last decade or so.
"Experts said..." LOL

I actually think a warmer world, whether it's from Co2 or the sun cycles, is a good thing for the planet and certainly our species. Nobody likes to admit this fact, but the byproducts of burning coal are cooling agents in the atmosphere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:32 AM
 
Location: a bar
2,722 posts, read 6,109,727 times
Reputation: 2978
Due to worldwide population growth, this shouldn't surprise anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:38 AM
 
5,921 posts, read 2,755,287 times
Reputation: 3432
Maybe if we tax and spend a Quadrillion Dollars, the growth of Co2 emissions will finally flatten out? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top